Press Release
EdWealth Announces MoneyBench Benchmark Comparing AI Money Answers From Ed, ChatGPT and Gemini
New York, United States, August 31st, 2026, FinanceWire
EdWealth (edwealth.ai) today announced the publication of MoneyBench, a benchmark developed by the company to evaluate how AI systems answer personal finance questions. The benchmark compares Ed, EdWealth’s AI personal finance coach, with ChatGPT and Gemini on usefulness and factual accuracy.
Ask an AI about money and a confident, plausible answer arrives instantly. Whether the numbers are right is invisible as you read. In an Intuit Credit Karma survey, 52% of adults who acted on AI financial advice reported a poor decision [1].
According to EdWealth’s MoneyBench results for July, Ed ranked first, winning 62.3% of questions, compared with 20.8% for Gemini and 17.0% for ChatGPT [2].

What made the difference
Writing quality did not separate the three, and accuracy scores often matched. Usefulness did: Ed averaged 4.24 on a five-point scale to ChatGPT’s 3.62 and Gemini’s 3.47, higher on roughly seven of ten questions against each.

Five things set Ed apart:
- Live numbers. Ed’s 120-plus financial data-and-analysis tools query the current filing, live price, holdings table, not last quarter’s memory.
- Decision-first answers. Conclusion first, then reasoning, then options.
- Fact and interpretation, separated. Limits and deadlines are stated as rules, context and trade-offs as interpretation. Most AI blurs the two.
- A coach that stays. From what a user shares, Ed learns their numbers, goals and habits; every answer builds on the last, across cash flow, taxes, stock compensation, funds, insurance. Account connections are read-only.
- Statute, not guesswork. Phase-outs, benefit formulas and multi-year tax rules come from a base of 11,566 parameters, sourced to the IRS, SSA, CMS and state authorities, across 51 US jurisdictions.
Confidence is not correctness
“Wealthy families always had a money person to call. Everyone else got search results, then a confident chatbot,” said Allen Ng, founder of EdWealth. “Ed closes that gap: live numbers, the reasoning shown, the decision still yours.”
The answers were scored by Claude, an AI from Anthropic, which builds none of the three. It checked each answer’s key figures against live sources, and an answer containing a fact proven false could not win. That check cost Ed: its score fell 5.3 points, both competitors rose, and Ed still finished first. Its 40 losses appear in the paper beside the wins. Where Ed’s facts were wrong, its usefulness fell with them: useful answers are built on correct ones.

In May’s first round Ed placed third of three, held back by weak data retrieval. EdWealth rebuilt it, and Ed has led every round since.
The part no benchmark can measure
The same question has a different right answer for each person: holdings, taxes, goals. A general assistant answers for everyone; Ed answers for one person, and keeps learning them. The test could not see that: standalone questions, nothing known about the asker. A benchmark measures the answer; a money person of your own knows the question behind it.
The full paper, with complete results, method and limitations: edwealth.ai/moneybench.
“We put our product on trial in public,” said Ng. “Financial AI should be judged on one question: does it help a person make a better money decision. Useful, and right. Only then does the rest follow. Money at peace, wealth in motion.”
About EdWealth
EdWealth builds agentic AI products for personal financial clarity and Financial Fitness. Its debut product, Ed, is a personal finance coach for modern households; user data is never for sale. Ed is available at edwealth.ai, on the App Store, and on Google Play.
Disclaimer: Ed provides financial information and education only — not investment, tax, or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Ed does not provide personalised investment recommendations. Ed is not a licensed financial adviser; its AI-generated outputs may be wrong, and all decisions are your own. Consult a licensed professional before acting. Availability, features, and pricing may vary by jurisdiction; Ed is offered only where permitted by applicable law.
Website: https://www.edwealth.ai/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/edwealth.ai/
Media contact: info@edwealth.ai
Sources: [1] Intuit Credit Karma, survey of 1,019 US adults, fielded August 7-14, 2025. [2] Systems as tested, July 2026: Ed in production configuration; ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Sol) at Pro effort; Gemini (3.6 Flash) at default configuration.
Contact
Communications Lead
Phoebe Woo
EdWealth
info@edwealth.ai
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
RedHill Divests Talicia® to Apotex for $18 Million Cash Upfront Plus Milestones to Fuel Strategic Growth Opportunities
Raleigh, United States, August 31st, 2026, FinanceWire
Executes a major step in RedHill’s strategic roadmap to fundamentally reposition the Company’s commercial business toward new and larger product opportunities, revenue growth and an accelerated path toward operational profitability
—
Realizes substantial value from RedHill’s 70% stake in Talicia, currently held within a shared ownership and economic structure, while immediately creating a stronger liquidity position and fully funding the next major steps in RedHill’s transformational commercial expansion
—
Under the terms of the agreement, Apotex will pay RedHill an upfront payment of $18 million plus up to an additional $35 million in potential worldwide net sales milestone payments
RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDHL) (“RedHill” or the “Company”), a specialty biopharmaceutical company, today announced the divestment of its Talicia business to a subsidiary of Apotex Health Corp. (TSX: APTX) (“Apotex”) for an upfront payment of $18 million plus up to an additional $35 million in potential payments based on worldwide net sales milestones.
“This transaction is a pivotal milestone for RedHill. We are converting our 70% stake in Talicia into immediate capital, significantly stronger liquidity and meaningful potential upside, while fully funding the next major step in our commercial business expansion. I want to thank the RedHill team for developing and positioning this important product for success, targeting H. pylori infection, the main cause of gastric cancer and stomach ulcers,” said Dror Ben-Asher, RedHill’s Chief Executive Officer. “We are confident that given its proven capabilities, Apotex is the right home to grow Talicia globally. We thank Apotex for their partnership on the successful conclusion of this transaction, which unlocks the resources needed to scale RedHill’s existing gastrointestinal (GI) commercial franchise into a stronger and larger one, including new, high-value, FDA-approved product opportunities intended to drive sustained growth and accelerate our path toward operational profitability.”
Under the terms of the agreement, RedHill received $18 million in cash and has the potential to receive up to an additional $35 million in payments based on worldwide net sales milestones from Apotex. In return, Apotex will receive RedHill’s 70% interest in Talicia, following Apotex’s prior acquisition of Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s U.S. branded business, which included Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s 30% ownership in Talicia.
RedHill was advised by Morningstar Law Group and Greenberg Traurig LLP on this transaction.
About RedHill Biopharma
RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDHL) is a specialty biopharmaceutical company primarily focused on U.S. development and commercialization of drugs for gastrointestinal diseases, infectious diseases and oncology. RedHill’s key clinical late-stage development programs include: (i) opaganib (ABC294640), a first-in-class, orally administered sphingosine kinase-2 (SPHK2) selective inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, antiviral, metabolic and anticancer activity, targeting multiple indications with a track record of U.S. government and academic collaborations intended for medical countermeasure development including for EVD, radiation exposure indications such as GI-Acute Radiation Syndrome (GI-ARS), an ongoing Phase 2 study in prostate cancer in combination with darolutamide and a Phase 2/3 program for hospitalized COVID-19; (ii) RHB-102 (Bekinda), with a planned Phase 2 proof-of-concept study for GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist-associated GI intolerance, positive results from a U.S. Phase 3 study for acute gastroenteritis and gastritis, positive results from a U.S. Phase 2 study for IBS-D and potential UK submission for chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. RHB-102 is partnered with Hyloris Pharmaceuticals (EBR: HYL) for worldwide development and commercialization outside North America; (iii) RHB-204, a next-generation optimized formulation of RHB-104, with a planned Phase 2 study for Crohn’s disease (based on RHB-104’s positive Phase 3 Crohn’s disease study results); and (iv) RHB-107 (upamostat), an oral broad-acting, host-directed, serine protease inhibitor with potential for pandemic preparedness, including COVID-19 and also targeting multiple cancer and inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases.
About Apotex
Apotex is a Canadian-based global health company. Apotex improves everyday access to affordable, innovative medicines and health products for millions of people around the world, with a broad portfolio of generic, biosimilar, and innovative branded pharmaceuticals, and consumer health products. Headquartered in Toronto, with regional offices globally, including in the United States, Mexico, and India, Apotex is the largest Canadian-based pharmaceutical company and a health partner of choice for the Americas for pharmaceutical licensing and product acquisitions.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and may discuss investment opportunities, stock analysis, financial performance, investor relations, and market trends. Such statements may be preceded by the words “intends,” “may,” “will,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “estimates,” “aims,” “believes,” “hopes,” “potential” or similar words, and include, among others, statements regarding the divestment of Talicia and the potential use of the proceeds of that sale; the Company’s ability to acquire or develop new products, expected revenue growth, the Company’s anticipated path toward operational profitability, and the Company’s strategic plans for its commercial business. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and cannot be predicted or quantified, and consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: the risk that the divestment of Talicia does not result in any planned asset acquisitions, or that any such acquisitions are not commercially successful; the risk that proceeds from the transaction are insufficient to fund the Company’s strategic plans or that such plans do not achieve the anticipated results; the risk that opaganib is not accepted into Ebola virus disease control programs, or if accepted, that it does not demonstrate efficacy; the risk that development of RHB-204 for Crohn’s disease may not be completed, or if completed may not be approved or may not achieve commercial success; the risk that opaganib is not effective against the indications for which we develop our products; the risk that RHB-102 (Bekinda) does not effectively reduce GLP-1/GIP-related nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; the risk regarding the Company’s ability to regain and maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, including the minimum bid price requirement; the risk that the addition of new revenue generating products or out-licensing transactions will not occur; the risk that the Company will not receive future milestone payments under its existing agreements, including under the Apotex agreement, or that they will be less than anticipated; the risk of current uncertainty regarding U.S. government research and development funding and that the U.S. government is under no obligation to continue to support development of our products and can cease such support at any time; the risk that acceptance onto the RNCP Product Development Pipeline or other governmental and non-governmental development programs will not guarantee ongoing development or that any such development will not be completed or successful; the risk that the FDA does not agree with the Company’s proposed development plans for its programs; the risk that the Company’s development programs and studies may not be successful and, even if successful, such studies and results may not be sufficient for regulatory applications, including emergency use or marketing applications, and that additional studies may be required; the risk that the Company will not successfully commercialize its products; as well as risks and uncertainties associated with (i) the initiation, timing, progress and results of the Company’s research, manufacturing, pre-clinical studies, clinical trials, and other therapeutic candidate development efforts, and the timing of the commercial launch of its commercial products and ones it may acquire or develop in the future; (ii) the Company’s ability to advance its therapeutic candidates into clinical trials or to successfully complete its pre-clinical studies or clinical trials or the development of any necessary commercial companion diagnostics; (iii) the extent and number and type of additional studies that the Company may be required to conduct and the Company’s receipt of regulatory approvals for its therapeutic candidates, and the timing of other regulatory filings, approvals and feedback; (iv) the manufacturing, clinical development, commercialization, and market acceptance of the Company’s therapeutic candidates; (v) the Company’s ability to establish and maintain corporate collaborations; (vi) the Company’s ability to acquire products approved for marketing in the U.S. that achieve commercial success and build its own marketing and commercialization capabilities; (vii) the interpretation of the properties and characteristics of the Company’s therapeutic candidates and the results obtained with its therapeutic candidates in research, pre-clinical studies or clinical trials; (viii) the implementation of the Company’s business model, strategic plans for its business and therapeutic candidates; (ix) the scope of protection the Company is able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering its therapeutic candidates and its ability to operate its business without infringing the intellectual property rights of others; (x) parties from whom the Company licenses its intellectual property defaulting in their obligations to the Company; (xi) the Company’s ability to collect on its judgement against Kukbo; (xii) estimates of the Company’s expenses, future revenues, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; (xiii) the effect of patients suffering adverse experiences using investigative drugs under the Company’s Expanded Access Program; (xiv) competition from other companies and technologies within the Company’s industry; and (xv) the hiring and employment commencement date of executive managers. More detailed information about the Company and the risk factors that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements is set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 27, 2026. All forward-looking statements included in this press release are made only as of the date of this press release. The Company assumes no obligation to update any written or oral forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by law.
Contact
Chief Corporate & BD Officer
Adi Frish
RedHill Biopharma
adi@redhillbio.com
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
MEXC Data: BTC Breaks $80,000, Major-Asset Spot Trading Volume Surges 300%
Mutsamudu, Comoros, August 31st, 2026, Chainwire
MEXC, a pioneer in 0-fee digital asset trading, reports a sharp rise in Spot trading activity on the platform as BTC topped $80,000 and ETH and SOL reached near six-month highs. From August 20 to 22, the average daily Spot trading volume of BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP increased by approximately 299% from the daily average recorded between August 1 and 17. Over the same period, the combined average daily trading volume of ETH, SOL, and XRP exceeded that of BTC. Compared with the BTC-dominated trading structure seen from August 1 to 17, activity on the platform spread noticeably across a broader range of major assets.
This shift in trading composition had already emerged on August 19. On that day, the combined trading share of ETH, SOL, and XRP rose from 30.5% a day earlier to 46.7%, an increase of 16.2 percentage points and the largest single-day gain in August. Their combined daily share subsequently remained above the 34.9% baseline recorded from August 1 to 17, indicating that trading interest in these three major assets had begun to rise before BTC broke above $80,000.
On August 25, when BTC topped $80,000, BTC Spot trading volume increased by approximately 164% from the August 1 to 17 daily average. ETH volume rose by 220%, while SOL and XRP each increased by approximately 500%. BTC remained an important market signal during this rally, but the increase in platform activity was not limited to BTC. Instead, multiple major assets became active at the same time.
The trend continued on August 27, when ETH and SOL climbed to nearly six-month highs. On MEXC, ETH Spot trading volume increased by 36.3% from the previous day, while SOL volume rose by 109.7%. Together, the two assets accounted for 46.4% of combined trading volume across the four assets, marking a new August high and making them the primary drivers of the day’s increase in trading activity.
As market sentiment strengthens, trading demand can rotate quickly across major assets, making trading costs and execution efficiency increasingly important for users seeking to respond to market movements. MEXC currently offers 0-fee trading on selected SOL Spot trading pairs and all XRP Spot trading pairs. Combined with deep liquidity, this enables users to navigate market rotations at lower cost and with greater efficiency while capturing more opportunities.
About MEXC
MEXC is the world’s fastest-growing cryptocurrency exchange, trusted by more than 40 million users across 170+ markets. Built on a user-first philosophy, MEXC offers industry-leading 0-fee trading and access to over 3,000 digital assets. As the Gateway to Infinite Opportunities, MEXC provides a single platform where users can easily trade cryptocurrencies alongside tokenized assets, including stocks, ETFs, commodities, and precious metals.
MEXC Official Website| X | Telegram |How to Sign Up on MEXC
For media inquiries, please contact MEXC PR team: media@mexc.com
Contact
MEXC PR team
media@mexc.com
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
100x Engine vs Hiring an Agency: An Honest Comparison
I have paid for both. That is the only reason this piece exists.
Most comparisons of this kind are written by people who have used one option and are guessing about the other. I spent nine months with a digital marketing agency before joining 100x Engine at Imperfect Labs, and I have now been inside that program for over a year.
The two experiences are not slightly different. They are different in kind.
Quick context on me: I run an advisory practice. Fourteen years in. Not a creator, never wanted to be one. I went looking for help because referrals had stopped scaling and I had no other way to reach people who did not already know someone who knew me.
What Hiring an Agency Actually Looks Like
I paid Rs 70,000 a month. That is Rs 8.4 lakh a year, and I was at the lower end of the market. Most competent agencies in India charge between Rs 1 lakh and Rs 1.5 lakh a month, so Rs 12 to 18 lakh annually.
For that I got a content calendar, a monthly shoot, and about twelve posts a month produced for me.
The work was not bad. It was competent, on time, and professionally edited. The strategy deck they gave me in month one was genuinely thoughtful.
Here is what went wrong anyway.
It did not sound like me. A client mentioned it about four months in. He said my Instagram felt like a different person from the one he sat across from in meetings. That was not a small problem. In advisory work, the entire product is that people trust your judgment. Content that sounds like a marketing department actively worked against the thing I was trying to build.
I learned nothing. Nine months in, I understood Instagram exactly as well as I had on day one. I could not have written a hook. I could not have told you why one video worked and another did not. I was renting a capability, not developing one.
The growth was flat. I went from roughly 400 followers to about 2,900 in nine months. Not nothing, but not much for Rs 6.3 lakh spent. More importantly, almost none of it converted to anything. No inbound enquiries. No conversations that started because someone had watched my content.
When it ended, everything stopped. This is the part people underestimate. I paused the retainer to reassess. Within three weeks there was no content going out, because there was no mechanism for content to exist without them. I had spent Rs 6.3 lakh and owned nothing that survived the invoice stopping.
What 100x Engine Actually Looks Like
The first thing that struck me was the speed.
I expected an onboarding phase, the way the agency had a discovery phase. Instead I was recording video on day two. Profile work, bio, audio setup, everything else ran at the same time in the background.
Imperfect Labs calls these parallel journeys. Nothing waits for anything else. The reasoning is that you learn faster from your own bad footage than from any lesson about making good footage.
I found this stressful for about ten days and then understood why they do it.
What is actually in the program:
| Component | What it means |
| Blue Ocean Strategy | Finding the angle in your field nobody has taken. Ongoing all year, not one call. |
| Happy Hour with Shivansh Garg | 18 sessions across the year. Turn up, ask anything, bring a drink. |
| Weekly Viral Hour with Sanket | Every week. What is working on Instagram right now. |
| WhatsApp with a growth consultant | They message you first. You do not chase anyone. |
| Front Row Sessions | Live Q&As with industry leaders. |
The Blue Ocean Strategy piece is the one I misunderstood going in. I assumed it was a niche-picking session at the start. It is not. Shivansh Garg and the team kept coming back to it all year, asking questions as my content produced actual data. My starting angle was generic. Where I ended up was much narrower and much better, and I would not have found it in one session.
The Viral Hour sessions with Sanket run weekly. He is behind over 1 billion organic views and Rs 25 crore in revenue across the brands he has worked on. The insights here are genuinely game changing. He covers what the platform is rewarding that week and breaks down specific videos that spread, explaining why. A recorded course cannot do that. Neither could my agency, who were working from a strategy document written nine months earlier.

The WhatsApp access works differently from what I expected. I assumed I would send questions and receive answers. What actually happens is the consultants message first. Your hook is describing instead of creating tension. Your last three posts used the same structure. This topic is moving in your space right now, here is an angle.
I never had to know the right question. With the agency, I had to know what to ask for, and I did not know enough to ask well.
The Numbers Side by Side
| Agency | 100x Engine | |
| Annual cost | Rs 12L to Rs 18L | Rs 5.5L |
| Who makes the content | Their team | You, with guidance |
| Does it sound like you | Rarely | That is the point |
| What you learn | Nothing | The whole method |
| If you stop paying | Everything stops | Skills and audience stay |
| My growth in 9 months | 400 to 2,900 | Not applicable |
| My growth in 12 months | Not applicable | 620 to 21,300 |
The cost comparison surprised people I explained this to. The assumption is that a program with direct founder access costs more than an agency retainer. It costs less than half of what a mid-tier agency charges for a year, and I already knew from experience what the agency year produced.


Done For You vs Done With You
This is the whole comparison compressed into one distinction.
An agency does it for you. That is the product. You hand over the problem and they hand back output. For a company selling a product, this makes complete sense. Nobody needs the CEO to personally understand Instagram hooks.
For an individual professional, it makes much less sense. Your credibility is the product. When someone else writes your credibility, it does not read as credible.
100x Engine does it with you. The positioning is yours because you built it. The instincts are yours because you developed them. If I left tomorrow, none of it disappears.
That is not a marketing line. It is the mechanical difference between the two models and it explains every other difference on the list.
Where the Agency Was Genuinely Better
Being fair about this.
It required nothing from me. Once a month I sat for a shoot and the rest happened without my involvement. During my busiest quarters, that was worth something real. 100x Engine requires two to three posts a week and there is no version where someone else does that for you.
The production quality was higher. Their editing was better than mine will ever be. My content looks like a professional filmed on a phone, because it is. Theirs looked polished.
There was no learning curve. I did not have to get comfortable on camera, which took me about six weeks in the program and was genuinely unpleasant.
If your goal is a presentable Instagram presence with minimal personal involvement, an agency delivers that. It just will not build you an audience that trusts you, because trust does not survive being outsourced.
What Actually Changed
Twelve months into 100x Engine I was at 21,300 followers, up from 620.
More importantly, inbound enquiries started arriving from people who had never met me. In fourteen years of practice that had never happened once. Two of them converted into engagements that between them covered the program fee several times over.
I have now renewed for a second year. That decision took me a week, because Rs 5.5 lakh is a real number and I do not spend it casually. What settled it was that I already knew what happens when I stop. I had tested that with the agency. Content stops, drift sets in, nothing compounds.
Which One Fits Which Situation
An agency makes sense if:
- You are a company or brand rather than an individual
- Your face and voice are not the product
- You genuinely cannot commit any weekly time to content
- Polish matters more to you than connection
100x Engine makes sense if:
- Your credibility is the business
- You have real expertise built over years
- You can post two to three times a week even in bad weeks
- You want to own what gets built rather than rent it
There is a version of this decision where both are wrong, incidentally. If you are early in your career and have not yet developed a point of view worth broadcasting, neither option helps. The agency will produce content about nothing and the program will keep asking you questions you cannot answer yet.
The Thing I Wish Someone Had Told Me Earlier
I spent Rs 6.3 lakh before I understood what I was actually buying.
The question is not which option is better. It is what you want to exist at the end of the year. An agency gives you twelve months of content. A done with you program gives you the ability to make content for the rest of your career, plus an audience that came to you because of how you think.
Both cost money. Only one of them compounds.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
-
Press Release5 days ago
Ghanaian Royal and Business Delegation to Convene in Dallas for U.S.–Ghana Investment Symposium
-
Press Release6 days ago
Blockchain Infrastructure Firm tZERO Integrates with Sui for Institutional-Grade Digital Asset Securities
-
Press Release4 days ago
SMS Gadget: Bangladesh’s Authorized Best Shop Delivers Latest iPhone Just One Day After Official Launch
-
Press Release1 week ago
OKINAWA HARBORVIEW HOTEL completes full-scale renovation to deliver a modern Okinawan experience
-
Press Release6 days ago
Team Miracle Cyprus IVF Centre Presents Comprehensive Male Fertility Solutions With Inclusive Care
-
Press Release4 days ago
The Bookish Magazine Releases Issue 2, Celebrating Stories That Stand the Test of Time
-
Press Release2 days ago
Post Oak Group Weighs In on Private Credit’s Expanding Role in Middle-Market Financing
-
Press Release4 days ago
YZi Labs Backs TermMax to Advance On-Chain Bond Market Infrastructure
