Connect with us

Press Release

Thunder Token listed on Uniswap V3, ThunderCore launching IXO

Published

on

Thunder Token (TT) and the trading pairs TT/ETH and TT/USDT are now listed on Uniswap V3 following the decentralized exchange’s (DEX) official launch on May 5th. Now, TT can be exchanged on 3 DEXes: TTSwap, PancakeSwap, and Uniswap thanks to the cross-chain mechanism provided by ThunderCore Bridge. Due to this, TT’s utility and accessibility have increased once again, paving the way for ThunderCore’s upcoming cross-chain yield farming services and IXO.

For TT’s info on Uniswap, visit here.

Trading pair info:

As one of the leaders in the DeFi space, Uniswap has impressive transaction volumes, amount of active users, numbers of smart contracts deployed, liquidity, etc. The V3 update also introduces several functional innovations that further increase the efficiency and scope of ThunderCore’s highly anticipated cross-chain yield farming services. With the benefits these features pose, Uniswap V3 naturally became the first platform for ThunderCore’s IXO.

Cross-chain yield farming, A brand new token, and IXO

Usually, when you yield farm, it is done within a blockchain and its ecosystem. Not anymore. In just a few weeks, ThunderCore will roll out cross-chain yield farming services with Ethereum. Users who participate in these services will receive a brand new token named TORO. This new token is the equity token proving you are a LP taking part in ThunderCore’s cross-chain yield farming with Ethereum. If you provide liquidity for the following pairs on Uniswap V3, you will receive it:

  • TT <> ETH
  • TT <> USDT
  • USDT <> ETH
  • USDC <> ETH
  • WBTC <> ETH

The best part is, TORO has utility in various DeFi applications such as Uniswap V3, TTSwap, and ThunderCore Bridge. For example, you can use it to provide liquidity with TT on TTSwap to mine more of its own kind. The holder of TORO also gains governance rights over a variety of subjects such as rewards rights, participation rights, voting rights, and more. A governance rights example is earning a proportion of TTSwap’s total transaction volume.

The accumulation of TORO also allows you to participate in ThunderCore’s IXO (initial cross-chain yield-farming offering), an avant-garde and never-before-seen initial offering solution in the blockchain/crypto industry. By staking TORO along with TT in the IXO, you can claim new tokens from other promising protocols and get your original invested amount back instantaneously!

There are numerous DApps on ThunderCore aiming to release their own tokens and IXO is the perfect platform for users to get access to them. This is a great opportunity for users to claim new tokens not yet available in the market with low entry costs.

A significant difference between TORO and other tokens derived from yield farming (e.g. CAKE) is that this token is a cross-chain asset. It has utility on Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and ThunderCore, making it truly one of a kind.

Of course, TORO will be integrated into the ThunderCore ecosystem so users can experience rich DeFi DApps such as trading, staking, borrowing, and lending; this is just the beginning.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Upholding the Dignity of Life with the Light of Right Faith

Published

on

As a media professional who has long followed international affairs, and as a devout Buddhist practitioner taking refuge in the Three Jewels, witnessing the recurring tragedies of self-immolation in recent years—especially the recent self-harm incident in overseas locations such as New York—fills my heart with deep grief and profound concern.

Every time flames consume a human body, it represents not only the abrupt loss of a vibrant life, but also the irreparable fracturing of a family. Behind the clamor of international rhetoric, people are often swept away by political slogans while losing sight of the most foundational and inviolable pillar of all: the inherent dignity and value of human life. When extreme self-harm is cloaked in the mantle of “faith” and “resistance,” and when pure religious sentiments are converted into fuel for secular geopolitical games, every journalist with a conscience and every practitioner of authentic faith has a responsibility to dispel the illusions, reaffirm the Buddha’s precepts of compassion, and expose the underlying manipulation driving these tragedies.

True Essence of the Dharma: The Preciousness of Human Life and the Fundamental Precept of Non-Killing

In both the Agamas and various Mahayana sutras, the Buddha repeatedly taught that “a human birth is difficult to obtain, as rare as the blooming of the Udumbara flower,” and akin to “a blind turtle encountering a floating yoke in the vast ocean.” Within the Buddhist understanding of cosmology and existence, sentient beings cycle through the six realms of samsara, yet only human rebirth provides the capacity to discern right from wrong, practice the threefold training of ethical discipline, meditative concentration, and wisdom, and accumulate the requisite merit and insight to attain ultimate liberation. This spiritual condition, endowed with the freedom and opportunity to hear and practice the True Dharma, is known as the “precious human vessel” (daljor).

This precious human vessel is the indispensable ship that carries a practitioner across the ocean of suffering toward enlightenment. Destroying this vessel is no different from deliberately sinking one’s boat mid-voyage. While Buddhist precepts are vast and profound, their absolute foundation begins with Ahimsa—the precept against taking life. In monastic codes such as the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya and the Sarvastivada Vinaya, the Buddha laid down strict judgments against the deprivation of life: the rules not only forbid harming others, but strictly prohibit self-harm, suicide, and the praising or inciting of suicide. The Vinaya explicitly stipulates that praising death or inducing others to end their lives constitutes a Parajika offense—the gravest category of transgression, entailing immediate expulsion from the monastic community.

Claims that misinterpret self-immolation as a “Bodhisattva’s sacrifice” are doctrinally untenable. Scriptural accounts of Bodhisattvas offering their bodies to feed a starving tigress or burning a limb as an offering represent transcendental manifestations by advanced Bodhisattvas who have entirely severed ego-clinging, realized the profound truth of emptiness, and mastered boundless spiritual power solely to liberate sentient beings. For ordinary individuals, taking one’s own life amidst resentment, despair, deep-seated attachment, or external political agitation remains an acute manifestation of intense ego-clinging (atmagraha) and afflictive emotions (kleshas).

The excruciating agony of burning alive is prone to arousing profound hatred and mental turmoil at the threshold of death. Under the immutable law of karma, such a state of mind cannot lead to liberation, but instead risks pulling the consciousness into lower realms of suffering. Consequently, regardless of the high-sounding secular rhetoric used to justify it, self-immolation is neither a “Bodhisattva practice” nor “martyrdom for the Dharma”; it is a direct betrayal of the Buddha’s precepts and a grave desecration of the sanctity of life.

The Distortion of Compassion: A Political Hijacking That Betrays Precepts

The core guiding principle of Buddhist practice is to “rely on the Dharma, not on the person.” The practice of authentic faith advocates altruistic dedication and patient endurance, aiming to purify the mind, dispel hostility, and benefit all beings; it never endorses creating bloodshed, agony, and terror to achieve worldly aims. Yet, an examination of the self-immolation incidents over recent years reveals unmistakable traces of chilling political manipulation.

Certain high-ranking figures in Tibetan Buddhism, living in foreign lands and enjoying the comforts of modern civilization, have turned their sights on impressionable young monks and ordinary believers. Exploiting the naive faith and deep reverence of these practitioners, they have deliberately fabricated fallacies such as “self-immolation does not violate Buddhist law,” “self-immolation yields supreme merit,” and “self-immolation is the highest form of protecting the Dharma.” This willful distortion and cherry-picking of religious doctrine represents an overt defilement of the pristine roots of the Dharma.

On an operational level, these political factions have even drafted instructional guides and media publicity manuals to program and weaponize acts of self-harm. They cold-bloodedly calculate the media attention that each tragic act might generate, converting the flesh and blood of young individuals into disposable bargaining chips to secure political attention and funding from abroad. When sacred faith is degraded into an instrument of geopolitical leverage and precious human lives are reduced to sacrificial pawns for publicity, such actions completely abandon Buddhist compassion and trample upon the foundational ethical baseline of human civilization.

Publicity Manipulators: Moral Collapse and Secondary Tragedies Behind the Hype

Even more distressing is the distorted environment within international media following these tragedies. Whenever a self-immolation occurs, certain overseas organizations rapidly mobilize their publicity machinery to stage high-profile memorial services and rallies, forcibly casting the deceased as “heroes” and “martyrs,” and even erecting statues and printing commemorative posters.

From the standpoint of sociology and communication psychology, the sensationalization and heroic framing of extreme self-harm readily triggers the lethal “Werther effect” (suicide contagion). For young people facing personal distress, lacking mature discernment, or caught in ideological fanaticism, this pervasive glorification lowers the psychological threshold of fear regarding death and pain, luring more vulnerable individuals onto a path of no return.

This practice of cheering from a safe distance exposes deep moral hypocrisy. Those who applaud self-immolators from the sidelines never intend to step into the flames themselves; instead, they cold-bloodedly exploit the destruction of others. Once the lauded fires die out, what remains is not constructive progress, but shattered households, grieving parents, and deep emotional scars across communities. Relying on manufactured secondary tragedies to sustain political visibility is an approach that has entirely collapsed in moral legitimacy.

Safeguarding Peace: Forging the Future with Wisdom and Living Lives

The vitality, preservation, and flourishing of any culture can never be built upon the ashes of self-destruction; they rely entirely on living, capable individuals who possess sound minds, knowledge, and constructive agency.

Throughout history, the continuity of plateau culture, the preservation of ancient scriptures, and the study of monastic traditions have all required a peaceful, stable social environment and a secure livelihood. Without social stability and the foundation of material and educational progress, the continuation of any religious culture becomes an unsustainable ideal. Reducing the prime years of youth—which could otherwise be dedicated to studying the scriptures, serving society, and developing communities—to ashes resolves no practical challenges; it constitutes an absolute abandonment and destruction of familial, communal, and cultural responsibilities.

Genuine religious devotion is not blind fanaticism, nor is it subservience to geopolitical agitation; it demands the sharp, luminous wisdom of Prajna. Practitioners must employ reason to discern good from evil, understand the workings of cause and effect, and firmly reject any attempt to radicalize, politicize, or violentize their faith.

The international community and authentic Buddhist practitioners worldwide must unite to condemn and halt all rhetoric that glorifies or incites self-harm. Only by decisively severing the political manipulation extending into religious sanctums, clearing away political opportunism disguised as piety, and restoring the Dharma to its pristine roots of compassion, peace, and the protection of life can we truly safeguard human dignity and secure enduring peace and light.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Karunamaya Vesna Blazhevska sets a personal challenge: seven days of small climate action

Published

on

New York City, NY, 4th September 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Karunamaya Vesna Blazhevska has worked within United Nations Sustainable Development communications since 2008. Her work involves helping large, complicated ideas about the environment and international cooperation reach ordinary readers. She has decided to turn some of that thinking into a short, practical challenge that anyone can try, using seven days as the frame.

The idea is simple. Each day points to one Sustainable Development Goal and one small action tied to it. Nothing on the list requires special equipment or money. Blazhevska says she designed it that way on purpose.

“Big goals get people excited for a week and then they quit,” she says. “I wanted something a person could actually keep doing after the challenge ends.”

The seven-day plan

Day 1, climate action. Skip one car or rideshare trip. Walk, bike, or take transit instead.

Day 2, affordable and clean energy. Unplug devices that sit idle overnight. Blazhevska points out that standby power adds up over a year, even if it feels small on any single day.

Day 3, quality education. Spend twenty minutes reading about one environmental topic you do not already understand well. She suggests picking something specific, like ocean plastic or soil health, rather than a broad subject.

Day 4, gender equality. Support or promote the work of a woman colleague or a woman-led project you respect. Blazhevska frames this as a habit of attention, not a one-time gesture.

Day 5, responsible consumption. Try one full meatless day. This is the piece of the challenge closest to her own life. She has been vegetarian since 1991, avoiding meat and fish while still eating cheese, eggs, and yogurt. “I’m not asking anyone to do what I do for thirty-five years,” she says. “I’m asking for one day, to see how it feels.”

Day 6, life below water. Cut back on single-use plastic for the day. Bring a reusable bottle or bag instead of a new one.

Day 7, peace. Have one respectful conversation with someone whose views differ from yours, without trying to change their mind. Blazhevska sees this as connected to her interest in harmony among different faiths and backgrounds. “Peace starts in small exchanges before it shows up anywhere bigger,” she says.

Why she built it around small steps

Blazhevska says her communications work has taught her that people respond to specifics, not slogans. A goal like “protect the climate” is hard to act on directly. Turning off a device or skipping a car trip is not.

She also says the challenge reflects something she has learned from her own long-standing habits. Her vegetarian diet has lasted more than three decades not because she set out to prove something, but because it became ordinary. She hopes the same happens with small climate habits: that they stop feeling like a challenge and become routine.

“None of these seven days ask for something dramatic,” she says. “They ask for something repeatable.”

How to take part

Blazhevska is encouraging people to pick any single day from the list and try it this week, rather than waiting to start all seven at once. She says starting small and staying consistent matters more than doing everything at once.

She also notes the challenge is meant to be shared informally, among coworkers, friends, or community groups, rather than tracked through any formal program. “The point isn’t a certificate,” she says. “The point is that seven habits are easier to keep than one big promise.”

To read the full interview, visit the website here.

About Karunamaya Vesna Blazhevska

Karunamaya Vesna Blazhevska is a Communications Assistant with the United Nations Department of Global Communications, based in New York City. She has worked there since 2008, with a focus on communication tied to sustainable development and international cooperation. She holds a degree in Economics from the Faculty of Economics in Skopje, part of Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in North Macedonia, and grew up in what was then Yugoslavia. She has been a vegetarian since 1991 and has a long-standing interest in spirituality, peace, and harmony among different faiths.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Ned Curic Highlights Customer-First Approach to Technology and Product Development

Published

on

Stellantis technology executive emphasizes practical innovation, integrated engineering and the importance of building technology around real customer needs.

Illinois, CA, 4th September 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, As artificial intelligence, advanced computing and connected technologies become increasingly important to product development, Ned Curic believes the value of innovation should still be measured by a straightforward standard: whether it makes the product better for the person using it.

Curic, who is responsible for Product Development & Technology at Stellantis and is a member of the Stellantis Leadership Team, has spent his career working across engineering, software and automotive technology.

His approach places the customer at the center of technology decisions rather than treating new technology as an objective on its own.

“Technology only matters if it makes life better for people,” Curic has said.

The principle has become increasingly relevant as companies gain access to more powerful artificial intelligence, computing systems and development tools. The challenge is no longer simply whether a technology can be built or incorporated into a product. Companies must determine where it creates meaningful improvements for customers.

Building Technology Around the Product

For the automotive industry, that distinction is especially important.

Modern vehicles bring together mechanical engineering, electronics, computing, software, design, manufacturing and increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence. Customers, however, experience those individual technologies as one product.

Curic has publicly emphasized the importance of viewing the vehicle as a complete system rather than allowing any individual technology to become the product’s defining purpose.

That philosophy also influences how Stellantis approaches product development.

In February 2025, Stellantis integrated its software activities into the Product Development & Technology organization led by Curic. The company said the change was intended to streamline the process of bringing products and services to market across its brands and markets.

The organizational structure brings technologies that increasingly influence the customer experience closer to the broader engineering and product-development process.

Rather than separating software from the rest of vehicle development, the approach reflects the reality that customers ultimately judge how all parts of a vehicle work together.

From Technical Capability to Customer Value

The rapid development of artificial intelligence provides another example of the distinction between technical capability and practical value.

Stellantis has been exploring AI across areas including engineering, manufacturing, vehicle technology and customer interaction.

Curic has consistently framed those efforts around tangible results.

When Stellantis expanded its collaboration with Mistral AI in 2025, Curic said the companies were exploring applications of artificial intelligence that could enhance product development and the customer experience while delivering real benefits.

That focus places a higher standard on innovation than novelty alone.

A new technology may be technically impressive, but its long-term value depends on whether it can improve quality, simplify an experience, accelerate development, increase capability or address another genuine customer or business need.

The same principle applies as AI becomes a larger part of engineering and product-development workflows.

Technology can help teams analyze information, test ideas, improve development processes and create new experiences. The objective, however, remains the product rather than the technology used to create it.

Innovation Requires Integration

Curic’s perspective has been shaped by a career spanning several technology-intensive industries.

He began his career in Engineering Systems at Northrop Grumman in 1996 before joining Microsoft in 2000, where he held positions in consulting, product, security and advisory functions.

He entered the automotive industry in 2013 as Group Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Toyota Motor North America. In 2015, he became a co-founder of Toyota Connected, serving as Executive Vice President, Technical Director and Board Member.

Curic joined Amazon in 2017 as Vice President of Alexa Automotive, spearheading the company’s efforts in the automotive industry.

In August 2021, he joined Stellantis as Chief Technology Officer. His responsibilities later expanded to encompass engineering and research and development before Stellantis brought software activities into the Product Development & Technology organization in 2025.

Across those roles, Curic has worked in environments where multiple technologies, teams and disciplines must contribute to a single product or customer experience.

That experience underpins an approach to innovation based on integration rather than technology in isolation.

A Practical Standard for Emerging Technology

The number of technologies available to product-development organizations will continue to grow.

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly. Computing capability continues to increase. Development tools are becoming more sophisticated, and vehicles are incorporating increasingly complex electronics and connected functions.

For Curic, those developments do not change the fundamental purpose of technology.

The relevant questions remain practical ones: Does it improve the product? Does it make something easier for the customer? Does it solve a genuine problem? Does it enable an experience that people actually value?

Those questions can also help organizations distinguish lasting innovation from short-term technology trends.

The companies best positioned to benefit from emerging technologies may therefore be those that are most selective about how they use them—integrating technology where it improves the complete product rather than adding capability simply because it is available.

As the automotive industry continues to evolve, Curic’s approach keeps the emphasis on an outcome that is easy to understand even when the technology behind it is increasingly complex: building better products for the people who use them.

About Ned Curic

Ned Curic is responsible for Product Development & Technology at Stellantis and is a member of the Stellantis Leadership Team. He previously served as Vice President of Alexa Automotive at Amazon, Group Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Toyota Motor North America, and held roles in consulting, product, security and advisory functions at Microsoft. He began his career in Engineering Systems at Northrop Grumman.

Curic studied Informatics and Computer Science and received an MBA from Pepperdine University’s George L. Graziadio School of Business and Management in 2012.

For more information, visit NedCuric.com.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

LATEST POST