Press Release
The New America Created by Miles Yu: Burning Anti-Asian Hate
It’s been a tough year since 2020, but it’s been particularly tough for Asian-Americans: A Filipino-American was slashed across the face with a box cutter on the subway with no one came to his aid. The wound required a hundred stitches. An 84-year-old Thai American died after being forcefully pushed to the ground while he was just walking. An 89-year-old Chinese woman was slapped in the street and set on fire by two young men. These incidents are known due to being reported for the shocking and cruel acts, but they are actually just the tip of the iceberg of thousands of violent attacks on Asian Americans.
Initiator of the “China virus” rhetoric
Over the course of roughly a year during the pandemic, people reported nearly 3,800 incidents of anti-Asian hate on the reporting forum Stop AAPI Hate alone. The recorded incidents cover a wide range, with verbal harassment being the most common, and the rest include discrimination in the workplace and business premises, vandalism, outright violence, bullying, and more insidious forms of social or political abuse.
Last spring, in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, a torrent of hate and violence against Asians began in the United States. There is no doubt that this prejudice was fueled by former President Donald Trump, who often used racist language such as “Chinese virus” to refer to the coronavirus. Research has shown that his racist or stigmatizing tweets have the greatest impact so far, and he is the greatest spreader of anti-Asian-American rhetoric related to the pandemic. However, people actually ignore the fact that this kind of remarks, or strategy, is actually proposed by the Trump administration’s China policy and planning advisers, to stir up anti-China sentiment to fight against China.
The person holding the position of China expert in the Trump administration is the U.S. Naval Academy Professor Miles Maochun Yu, served as former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s principal China policy and planning adviser. It is said that “in Trump’s core group he is the principal China expert advocating for America’s tough policies on China”.
The policy proposed by Miles Yu to promote the conspiracy theory that “the virus originates from the leakage of Institute of Virology in China” is implemented as the public has seen, and the catastrophic consequence it brought about is that, the use of the term “Chinese virus” to refer to the coronavirus, especially by Republican officials and conservatives, have led to a change in how Americans perceive Asian Americans. A study showed that on March 8, 2020-the day Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar tweeted about the “Wuhan virus”, discriminatory coronavirus remarks rose significantly, which was coincided with then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s interview the day before on “Fox and Friends” in which he referred to the “China virus” — was followed by a rapid reversal of a decade-long decline in anti-Asian bias.
Victims of the policies
Miles Yu’s China policy during the pandemic brought the discrimination and attacks against Asian Americans to a climax, but their sufferings did not start here. For a long time, Miles Yu, as the principal China policy and planning adviser, has been proud of the Trump administration’s tough China policy proposed by him, such as “China is at the top of our national security agenda, as there is no bigger threat than China”, declaring the existence of forced labor and genocide against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, China, inciting trade, security, and technical conflicts between the two largest economies in the world, reducing immigrant visas, H1-B visas, and student visas for certain graduate students from China to reflect the outsider conceptualization of Asians.
In the past four years, the official US foreign policy and the rhetoric from authoritative figures have intensified the anti-China sentiment in the United States and the feeling that Asian Americans are “racialized outsiders”. Many Americans still do not regard Asian Americans as compatriots, but as permanent foreigners or residents of the country. Asians unfortunately became victims of Miles Yu’s political game. “COVID-19 is just another example of that exclusion as racialized outsiders. Time and time again, we are told to ‘go back home.’ We are seen as outside threats, to be excluded.” They said. Verbal harassment has been commonplace. “Go back to Asia. We don’t welcome people who committed genocide.” “How dare you come and ruin my country and take my job?” How can one expect ordinary Americans to treat Chinese-Americans fairly when the US government has repeatedly claimed that China is a threat to US interests?
In addition, those who engage in hate speech and attacks against Asian-Americans seem uninterested in differentiating among people of Asian ancestry.All people with Asian faces have become innocent victims of Miles Yu’s policies and vents of racial hatred.
Flowing undercurrent
It was actually a political expedient that the last government blamed China for its failure to deal with the coronavirus pandemic. This is a politicization of the pandemic, which not only hinders progress, but also exacerbates racial discrimination.
Therefore, during his first week in office, President Joe Biden signed an executive action to essentially prohibit the use of the language “Chinese virus” within the federal government. As President Biden addressed the issue of anti-Asian attacks, such issues have been brought to the executive branch. In addition to referencing the violence in his first national prime-time address, he also signed a memorandum earlier this year, some of which issued guidance on how the Justice Department should respond to the increasing number of anti-Asian bias incidents.
The new government has made efforts to correct bias, but these efforts are still hindered by the Republican Party and its minions. Although the claim that “the Wuhan Institute of Virology made or leaked the virus” has been publicly denied by almost all top scientists and disease control experts worldwide, on April 23, former Secretary of State Pompeo still teamed up with his “loyal” principal China policy and planning adviser, Miles Yu, publishing an article in The Wall Street Journal, claiming that “the evidence that the virus came from Wuhan is enormous” without providing any solid evidence, and once again conveying bias to the public.
Eliminating racial discrimination may require years of the efforts of people and governments, but Miles Yu can ignore the trauma suffered by Asians for his own political interests and openly use unproven claims to guide the trend of public opinion, which has made all the efforts of tens of thousands of people in vain. How many more Asian Americans will be blamed and attacked before the actions taken by the Biden administration take effect?
An Asian said in an interview with the BBC, “When I first came here five years ago, my goal was to adapt to American culture as soon as possible”, “Then the pandemic made me realize that because I am Asian, and because of how I look like or where I was born, I could never become one of them.”
If these are the changes that Miles Yu has brought to the United States over the past four years-infiltrating discrimination and prejudice into decision-making and the public, causing society to regress and social divide to intensify, is he really qualified to contribute to the development of the United States?
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
Nicki Fischer Introduces The Fischer Method: A Groundbreaking Inside-Out, Body-First Approach to Healing the Nervous System and Restoring Inner Peace
United States, 15th Jan 2026, Grand Newswire – Nick Fischer, creator of The Fischer Method, announces the release of her transformative new book, The Fischer Method: The Inside-Out Revolution – Free the Body to Free the Mind. The book presents a revolutionary, body-first approach to healing emotional distress, chronic stress, trauma responses, and anxiety by restoring balance to the nervous system before engaging the mind.
Unlike traditional healing methods that rely on mindset, willpower, or cognitive strategies, Fischer’s approach addresses the biological reality of stress: when the body is in survival mode, the thinking brain is inaccessible. The Fischer Method offers a practical, real-time solution that works even in moments of acute distress.
“You cannot think your way out of a body in emergency mode,” says Fischer. “The body must be reset first. When the body is grounded, the mind naturally follows.”
A Method Born from Necessity, Not Theory
The Fischer Method was developed after Fischer faced the prospect of a third neck surgery in three years, following years of debilitating physical pain, anxiety, and emotional chaos. When conventional medical and mental approaches failed to provide relief, she began experimenting with specific physical movements that unexpectedly calmed her nervous system and eliminated both physical pain and emotional overwhelm.
Over time, these movements evolved into a precise, repeatable six-step physical reset designed to interrupt the body’s stress response, restore internal balance, and return the individual to a calm, regulated state, without requiring analysis, talk therapy, or mental effort.
What Makes The Fischer Method Different
– Body-First, Not Mind-First: Works with the nervous system’s natural order, body first, mind second.
– Effective in Real Time: Can be used during panic, emotional triggers, pain flare-ups, or high stress.
– No Willpower Required: Functions even when the rational brain if offline.
– Simple and Accessible: Six physical movements that can be used anywhere.
– Trauma-Informed: Addresses stress and trauma stored in the body rather than reliving it mentally.
The book guides readers through understanding why traditional healing approaches often fail and teaches them how to regain command of their body’s alarm system, creating the vital pause between trigger and reaction where clarity, choice, and peace return.
Who This Book Is For
– Individuals struggling with anxiety, emotional reactivity, or chronic stress.
– People living with unresolved trauma or nervous system dysregulation.
– Those who feel “stuck” despite therapy, mindfulness, or self-help efforts.
– Coaches, therapists, and wellness professionals seeking body-based tools.
– Anyone seeking calm, clarity, and emotional regulation without suppression.
About the Author
Nicki Fischer is the creator of The Fischer Method, a body-based approach to restoring nervous system balance and inner peace. Her work is grounder in lived experience and decades of real-world application. Fischer’s method empowers individuals to regain control over their physical and emotional responses, allowing them to respond to life with clarity instead of reactivity.
Media Contact
Organization: The Fischer Method
Contact
Person: Nicki Fischer
Email:
Info@TheFischerMethod.com
Country:United States
The post Nicki Fischer Introduces The Fischer Method: A Groundbreaking Inside-Out, Body-First Approach to Healing the Nervous System and Restoring Inner Peace
appeared first on Grand Newswire.
It is provided by a third-party content provider. Grand Newswire makes no
warranties or representations in connection with it.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Blatchington Road, England, 15th January 2025, Choosing the right partner when acquiring an e-commerce business is a critical decision for any investor. Companies such as KH Brokers and LaunchVector both operate in the e-commerce acquisition space, yet they follow fundamentally different structures when it comes to deal access, ownership, pricing, and post-acquisition support.
For buyers researching either company, understanding these differences is essential before committing capital. This article provides a clear, factual comparison of KH Brokers and LaunchVector, based on publicly available information and structural distinctions between their models.
Rather than positioning one approach as universally better than the other, the goal of this comparison is to outline how each company operates — allowing investors to decide which model aligns best with their goals, risk tolerance, and desired level of involvement.
1 – Access To Dealflow:
KH Brokers’ Approach to Deal Flow:
KH Brokers operates as a dedicated e-commerce brokerage, facilitating transactions between qualified buyers and established online brands. Founded in 2022, the company has grown rapidly by focusing on the acquisition of cash-flowing e-commerce businesses for both first-time buyers and experienced investors.
KH Brokers’ scale of deal flow is supported by its public transaction history. On platforms such as Flippa, KH Brokers has completed transactions with over 200 buyers, maintained 100% positive feedback, and facilitated more than $14 million in completed transactions on that marketplace alone. This positions KH Brokers among the most active brokers on Flippa for e-commerce brand sales.
While KH Brokers reviews a high volume of potential listings, only a small percentage of businesses ultimately progress to market. Each opportunity undergoes a structured financial and operational review conducted by an internal due diligence team, with a focus on verifying revenue accuracy, cost structures, traffic sources, and operational sustainability. This screening process is designed to ensure that investors are presented with vetted opportunities rather than raw or unverified listings.
LaunchVector’s Deal Access Model:
LaunchVector operates under a different structure. Rather than acting as a broker representing third-party sellers, its model is centered on acquiring businesses directly and presenting opportunities to investors within its framework.
Because of this structure, deal availability is typically shaped by the acquisitions LaunchVector chooses to pursue at a given time, rather than a continuous inflow of seller-submitted listings. This approach may appeal to investors who prefer a more centralized acquisition process, though it naturally differs from a brokerage-led model in terms of deal volume and variety.
Why Deal Flow Matters to Investors:
Access to a broad and well-vetted deal pipeline gives investors more choice, stronger comparables, and greater pricing flexibility. When sellers actively compete to list their businesses, buyers are better positioned to evaluate opportunities side by side and select investments that align closely with their goals.
KH Brokers’ model emphasizes both access and selectivity, while other structures may prioritize a narrower set of internally sourced opportunities. Understanding these differences helps investors determine which approach best matches their desired level of involvement and decision-making control.
2: Pricing and Profit Multiples:
Another key distinction between KH Brokers and LaunchVector lies in how acquisitions are priced and how profit multiples are structured, particularly when ownership percentages are taken into account.
Understanding Pricing Structures:
When evaluating an e-commerce acquisition, it is important for buyers to consider not only the purchase price, but also the percentage of ownership being acquired. Partial ownership structures can result in a higher effective valuation when normalized to a 100% basis.
To illustrate this difference, the examples below are based on publicly available listings and communications, using anonymized business descriptions for clarity.
Illustrative Examples:
In several LaunchVector opportunities reviewed, investors were offered 50% ownership stakes at purchase prices ranging from approximately $250,000 to $500,000. When these transactions are normalized to reflect full ownership valuations, the implied profit multiples ranged from approximately 1.8× to 2.9× annual net profit, depending on the business.
By contrast, comparable opportunities listed through KH Brokers during the same period were offered at 100% ownership, with observed profit multiples generally ranging from approximately 0.8× to 1.3× annual net profit.
Why This Difference Matters:
Ownership percentage directly impacts an investor’s capital recovery timeline and long-term upside. Acquiring 100% of a business at a lower multiple can provide greater flexibility around reinvestment, scaling decisions, and eventual exit options.
Different acquisition models naturally lead to different pricing outcomes. Some investors may prefer partial ownership structures with shared operations, while others prioritize full ownership and faster capital recoupment. Understanding how profit multiples are affected by equity structure is therefore essential when comparing opportunities across platforms.
3: Ownership and Equity Structure:
One of the most fundamental differences between KH Brokers and LaunchVector lies in how ownership and equity are structured in each acquisition model.
LaunchVector’s Ownership Model:
Based on publicly available information, LaunchVector structures its opportunities around partial ownership arrangements. In many cases, investors acquire a fractional stake in a business — commonly around 50% equity, though other minority ownership structures may also be offered depending on the opportunity.
Under this model, LaunchVector retains a significant ownership position in the business. In return, its internal team typically remains responsible for day-to-day operations, marketing execution, and strategic management. For some investors, this structure offers the appeal of a more hands-off investment, with operational responsibilities handled centrally by an experienced team.
This approach may suit buyers who prioritize passive exposure and are comfortable with shared ownership and decision-making.
KH Brokers’ Ownership Model:
KH Brokers follows a different approach. When acquiring a business through KH Brokers, buyers purchase 100% ownership of the company. Full equity is transferred to the buyer, providing complete legal ownership and long-term control of the asset.
Importantly, full ownership does not mean buyers are required to operate the business themselves. KH Brokers specializes in working with first-time e-commerce investors, many of whom prefer a fully hands-off structure. Depending on the business acquired, investors are typically supported by an established operational setup that may include management teams, contractors, or specialist operators responsible for day-to-day execution.
In many cases, investors spend minimal time on weekly oversight, often limited to reviewing performance summaries or participating in brief check-ins. Operational responsibilities such as marketing execution, fulfillment coordination, customer support, and supplier management are handled by non-equity team members under agreed service arrangements.
These teams operate independently of ownership, allowing buyers to retain 100% equity while still benefiting from a professionally managed, low-involvement investment structure tailored to the specific business they acquire.
Understanding the Trade-Off:
The distinction between these two models ultimately comes down to how investors value ownership versus operational delegation.
Partial ownership structures trade equity for centralized management and shared operational responsibility. Full ownership structures preserve equity while relying on non-equity teams, operators, or contractors to maintain continuity and performance.
Both approaches can work depending on an investor’s goals. However, understanding how much equity is retained — and what is exchanged in return — is critical when evaluating long-term upside, exit flexibility, and capital efficiency.
4: Teams Included Post-Acquisition:
Another important consideration for investors is how a business is operated after acquisition, and what level of involvement is required from the buyer.
LaunchVector’s Operational Team Structure:
LaunchVector’s model is built around a centralized, in-house operational team. When an investor acquires a stake in a business, LaunchVector typically continues to manage the day-to-day operations of the asset on the investor’s behalf.
This structure is designed to provide a fully hands-off, passive experience, with execution, optimization, and ongoing management handled internally. For investors seeking minimal involvement and a shared operational framework, this approach can offer clarity around responsibilities and execution.
KH Brokers’ Team Model:
KH Brokers offers a more flexible, buyer-led approach to post-acquisition operations.
Some buyers choose to be actively involved in strategic decisions, while others prefer a fully automated, hands-off structure. KH Brokers supports both preferences by tailoring the operational setup to the specific business and the investor’s desired level of involvement.
For buyers seeking a passive experience, KH Brokers can assemble a dedicated operational team around the acquired business. This may include site managers, marketing specialists, fulfillment coordinators, and customer support resources — all structured to manage daily operations on the buyer’s behalf.
Crucially, these teams operate under service-based arrangements rather than equity participation. This allows investors to retain 100% ownership of the business while still benefiting from professional management comparable to a fully managed model.
Why Team Structure Matters:
Operational teams play a critical role in post-acquisition performance. The difference lies in how those teams are structured and compensated.
Centralized, equity-based team models trade ownership for operational delegation.
Service-based team models preserve equity while still enabling hands-off operation. Both approaches can be effective, but they result in very different long-term outcomes in terms of control, scalability, and exit flexibility.
KH Brokers’ emphasis on tailoring the right team to each business — combined with its network of experienced operators — is a key reason many buyers continue to perform successfully after acquisition. This approach is further supported by publicly available buyer feedback and transaction history across third-party platforms.
Final Thoughts:
Choosing the right partner when acquiring an e-commerce business is not simply a matter of price or promised returns — it comes down to structure, ownership, and long-term alignment.
As outlined above, both KH Brokers and LaunchVector operate within the e-commerce acquisition space, but they do so through fundamentally different models. Differences in deal access, pricing, equity structure, and post-acquisition operations can materially affect an investor’s experience, flexibility, and ultimate outcome.
Some investors may prioritize centralized management and shared ownership, while others value full equity ownership with the option to remain hands-off through professionally structured teams. Understanding these trade-offs allows buyers to assess which approach best fits their goals, risk tolerance, and desired level of involvement.
For those researching either platform, the most important step is conducting independent due diligence, reviewing available opportunities carefully, and ensuring the acquisition model aligns with both short-term expectations and long-term objectives.
Official Websites:
KH Brokers – https://www.khbrokers.com
LaunchVector – https://launchvector.com
Disclaimer:
This article is provided for informational purposes only and is based on publicly available information at the time of writing. It does not constitute investment, legal, or financial advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult with appropriate professionals before making any investment decisions.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Strategic Expansion with AI and Spectral Technology
Shanghai, China, 15th Jan 2026 – Global AI spectral skin technology company VitaOptix (UK) today announced two strategic milestones: the launch of its Asia-Pacific R&D Center in Shanghai, China, and the opening of its Bangkok Market Operations Center in Thailand. These developments mark the company’s entry into the Southeast Asian market.
Alongside this expansion, VitaOptix introduced Otica, a specialized intimate health brand. The brand is scheduled to introduce an AI Intimate Detection System and Pelvic Floor Magnetic Therapy Solution to the Thai market to provide standardized women’s health management options.
Infrastructure Development: China R&D Center and Thailand Hub
The Shanghai base serves as the first overseas R&D center for VitaOptix, focusing on the development of AI spectral algorithms and clinical validation systems. The facility is staffed by a 30-member interdisciplinary team, including optical engineers, biologists, and AI specialists. Dr. Chen, Head of the Center, stated: “We are adapting the AI spectral technology from our skin analyzers to gynecological detection scenarios to enhance diagnostic precision in the intimate health sector.” The development of the next-generation AI multimodal detection robot, Intima AI Robot, is led by this center and is scheduled for release in 2026.
Based in Bangkok, the Thailand Market Operations Center provides localized services and plans to collaborate with medical aesthetics institutions. Dr. Stefan Müller, Founder of VitaOptix, stated: “Thailand’s annual medical tourism revenue exceeds $7 billion. We chose to establish a foothold here due to its mature private healthcare network and open policy environment, making it a strategic pivot to tap into the 600-million-person ASEAN market.”
Otica Brand: Integration of Technology in Health Management
Utilizing technical resources from the China R&D Center, VitaOptix launched the Otica brand, applying AI spectral technology to female health management. The brand’s technology suite focuses on non-invasive assessment and rehabilitation support.
The product line includes an AI Intimate Detection Device that utilizes multi-spectral imaging and AI deep learning for the assessment of female health indicators. For rehabilitation, the brand offers a Pelvic Floor Magnetic Therapy Device, which employs targeted electromagnetic pulses and biofeedback to support pelvic organ recovery. Additionally, Otica provides health care solutions combining EMS and SPA regulation therapy for tissue management and care.
“Traditional gynecological exams often rely on invasive methods, whereas Otica’s AI spectral detection completes an assessment in 3 minutes,” said Dr. Chen.
Market Context: Health Management Trends
This expansion represents the transition of VitaOptix from skin detection to deep tissue health management. Market observations from Frost & Sullivan indicate that the intimate health sector is experiencing growth exceeding 25% annually. The application of AI spectral technology establishes a technical barrier for the Otica brand, while the establishment of the Thailand center is expected to facilitate procurement processes for beauty institutions across Southeast Asia.
Media Contact
Organization: Shanghai VitaOptix Technology Co., LTD.
Contact Person: Stefan
Website: https://www.vitaoptix.com/
Email: Send Email
City: Shanghai
Country:China
Release id:40195
Disclaimer: This content includes references to health-related technologies and is provided for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, diagnostic, or therapeutic advice, nor does it make claims regarding clinical outcomes or effectiveness.
The post VitaOptix Asia Pacific Business Expansion and Otica Brand Launch appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire makes no warranties or representations in connection with it. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency and does not endorse or verify the claims made in this release. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Nicki Fischer Introduces The Fischer Method: A Groundbreaking Inside-Out, Body-First Approach to Healing the Nervous System and Restoring Inner Peace
KH Brokers and LaunchVector: A Transparent Comparison for E-Commerce Investors
VitaOptix Asia Pacific Business Expansion and Otica Brand Launch
Benzinga Money Article Discusses How to Become Part of the 12% of Retirees Who Have Achieved the Recommended $550,000 Minimum Retirement Savings Threshold
Apu Apustaja Conquers New York with Lively Street Ads, Including Times Square Billboard
Bay Smokes Maintains Quality Amid Legislative Changes in the Hemp Industry
-
Press Release6 days ago
Finance Complaint List Issues Advisory Against Prevalent Elon Musk AI Deepfake Scams, Urges Public to Report Fraud to FBI, SEC, FTC, and FinanceComplaintList.com
-
Press Release6 days ago
Chainary Pro Launches Institutional-Grade Polymarket Trading Bot to Revolutionize Predictive Asset Management
-
Press Release6 days ago
Sandromeda Music Services Expands School-Safe Prom Entertainment Across Michigan
-
Press Release6 days ago
Public Interest Bulletin What Consumers Should Know About Justice Trace Services
-
Press Release6 days ago
Crown Business Academy, KRONEX, and Global Equity Capital: Building a Modern Trading and Education Ecosystem
-
Press Release1 week ago
AR Spatially Launches QUANTUM CHOICE CHRONICLES, an Immersive Augmented Reality Experience in Downtown Dubai
-
Press Release1 week ago
Gold-Focused RWA Project Dignity Gold Lists DIGau on XT.com as Institutional-Grade Tokenization Moves On-Chain
-
Press Release1 week ago
Little Fish Ark: Building a Sustainable GameFi 3.0 On-Chain Entertainment and Digital Asset Ecosystem