Connect with us

Press Release

Platon: To create a new digital civilization by Protecting CryptoArts

Published

on

CryptoArts, a new favorite in the digital age

Recently, a NFT painting of digital artist Beeple was sold for $69.34 million, setting a record price for cryptoart. Earlier, Dorsey, the CEO of twitter, transferred his first tweet as a NFT, with the price of about $2.9 million. The birth of these high-priced works of art has pushed the cryptoart into the artistic field,which has been changing people’s traditional cognition and empirical judgement of art. So what is NFT? Is NFT valuable?

NFT (non-homogeneous token) is also a kind of cryptocurrency asset, which relying on the blockchain network behind it. The holding information of these assets can be recorded in the blockchain. Different from bitcoin and Ethereum, each NFT is unique, so it is not for exchange, like basic commodity purchase or other basic transactions money. However, because of that NFT assets can’t be copied, works of art or collections can be transferred on the blockchain network as the unique cryptocurrency asset. For example, if you successfully register as a password artist on the NFT trading platform, your uploaded works of art can also become a NFT asset. The process of becoming a NFT can be regarded as “coinage”, and then by aggregating into blocks to become the unique token asset on the blockchain.

All along, the biggest attribute of art is uniqueness and irreplaceable, which coincides with the essence of NFT. In the traditional art market, artworks are repeatedly sold at high prices, which is unmatched by any other industry. At present, cryptoart is the most powerful growth area in the digital collection market.

Perfect combination of encryption technology and artistic value

Although NFT assets are unique and irreplaceable, and can exist in different forms and contents, their essence is still token. Token itself has no intrinsic value. Only when it is placed on the value system of the real world, can it be endowed with specific meanings.

When we buy a NFT, it actually means that we buy a “digital certificate” representing the ownership and authenticity, that is, we get a unique password generated by blockchain technology. For example, if you buy a painting in the art field, what others see is only a copy of the digital picture, while the buyer has the only original copy of the whole network. This work has been authenticated by blockchain technology, and has a digital signature that cannot be copied, so that buyers can confirm the uniqueness of their collection. The underlying logic is the consensus mechanism based on the network computing power of blockchain. For the cryptoart, this network flow based consensus is important. Through effective mechanisms to improve consensus, let more people know about the works, and by exposure and auction, or artists’ appearance on public media, can achieve “value-capture”, thus increasing the collection value and transaction price of works.

In this process, encryption and privacy protection technology play a key role. For a cryptoart, the owner should have both the ownership and the right to use. Currently, we only protects the ownership, but fails to protect the right to use. If the owner of a work puts a cryptoart on display in the gallery, the owner can get a share of the income from the exhibition, and only with the authorization of the owner, can the art work be fully displayed. Only in this way can the right to use of cryptoart be more effectively protected, which is what PlatOn’s privacy computing has been working for.

The privacy token contract of PlatOn can achieve the purpose of hiding identity through zero knowledge proof algorithm. Zero knowledge proof is to make the verifier believe that one has some knowledge or ability without providing any useful information to others, so as to protect the cryptoart. In addition, digital assets need to be taxed in the future, which also involves the trade of ownership. Token’s Rosetta privacy AI framework improves the efficiency of MPC (multi-party secure computing) and provides strong support for digital asset trading.

Platon’s Alaya scheme, Protecting the cryptoart

As a global blockchain leader, PlatOn, with its rich experience in the field of privacy protection, can help the digital identification and asset digitization of traditional works of art and even real estate, and help traditional assets become indelible and unchangeable . PlatOn launched the meta network Alaya scheme on October 24 last year. The scheme is based on distributed storage system, with globally distributed nodes, and is linked in the form of NFT. It supports the subsequent change of ownership of digital assets through cooperative transfer, so as to protect cryptoart and built a new digital civilization.

In addition, in the main network release of PlatOn is launched in last month, NFT transfer is also used for voting on the chain, and NFT badges in the main network community will be sent to all voting participants. It can be seen that PlatOn’s exploration on NFT privacy protection has been in the field including the cryptoart, community souvenirs, voting and so on, which will light the dawn of new digital civilization.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

David Torske Debunks Five Construction Myths That Cost Calgary Homeowners Time and Money

Published

on

  • David Torske, a Calgary, Alberta-based Project Coordinator and Associate Project Manager, shares practical fixes for common project assumptions that lead to delays, scope creep, and avoidable stress.

Alberta, Canada, 25th February 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, David Torske, a construction Project Coordinator and Associate Project Manager with experience in residential and commercial coordination, is calling out five common myths he sees derail projects in the Calgary area. Torske’s work focuses on scheduling, documentation, workflow optimization, and trade coordination, and he says the biggest problems often start long before anyone picks up a tool.

Most project issues do not begin with bad effort. They begin with bad assumptions. As Torske puts it, “Most delays aren’t a mystery. They’re a chain reaction from one small assumption that nobody wrote down.”

Below are five myths he says show up again and again, along with a simple correction and a tip anyone can apply immediately.

Myth 1: If you have a start date, you have a schedule

Why people believe it
A start date feels like a plan. Many people assume once work begins, everything naturally follows in order.

Correction (fact)
A schedule is a sequence, not a date. Trades have dependencies. Templating must happen before fabrication. Fabrication must happen before installation. Plumbing, tile, and electrical often have critical timing windows around installations.

“People think a schedule is a calendar. On site, it’s more like a relay race,” Torske says. “If one handoff slips, everything behind it shifts.”

Practical tip
Ask for a one-page sequence list before day one. It can be simple: Step 1, Step 2, Step 3. If there is no sequence, create one with the contractor in 10 minutes and confirm it in writing.

Myth 2: The cheapest quote is the best deal

Why people believe it
It is natural to compare and treat projects like products. In the chase for the best deal, people still expect the same outcome but at different prices.

Correction (fact)
Quotes are only comparable when scope is comparable. Lack of a comprehensive plan missing line items, unclear allowances, and vague descriptions often reappear later as extra costs or schedule delays.  

“The number on the quote is not the whole price,” Torske says. “The scope is the actual price.”

Practical tip
Before accepting any quote, highlight every item that is not specific. Replace general lines like “install as needed” with a measurable description. If a line cannot be described clearly, it cannot be priced clearly for later procurement.

Myth 3: Materials will be available when you need them

Why people believe it
Many assume materials are easy to source, especially for residential builds and common renovations.  Customers often are not as familiar with or understanding of the nature of project procurement as commercial stakeholders.  

Correction (fact)
Material timing drives project timing. Even when the work is ready, the job can pause if the right material is not on site. Procurement is part of scheduling, not a separate step.  

The coronavirus epidemic increased supply and transport management obstacles and issues.  Knowledge of the supply chain needs to be current and constant.   

Torske’s coordination work has included determining materials needed, procuring them, and building procurement and fabrication tracking in Excel to keep work moving.

“Procurement is not a shopping trip,” he says. “It’s a timeline.”

Practical tip
Create a simple materials checklist with three columns: Item, Who orders it, and When it must arrive. Confirm it before any demolition or site prep begins.

Myth 4: Changes are easy if they are small

Why people believe it
A small change feels harmless. People assume it can be absorbed without affecting the rest of the project.  They often feel such changes can be done at any stage in the process without an increase in scope.

Correction (fact)
Small changes can trigger big ripple effects. A minor layout adjustment can force rework across measurements, ordering, fabrication, and trade coordination. That creates cost and scheduling impacts, even when the change looks simple.

“The most expensive words in a project are ‘quick change,’” Torske says. “A change is only quick if nothing else depends on it.”

Practical tip
Use a one-sentence change rule: No change gets approved until it answers two questions in writing: What does it do to the schedule, and what does it do to the cost?

Myth 5: Good work speaks for itself, so documentation is optional

Why people believe it
People want to trust the process. Documentation can feel like bureaucracy.

Correction (fact)
Documentation reduces confusion. Clear records help keep scope, cost, and quality aligned.  Responsibilities and scope are provided.  Proper documentation prevents trade conflicts and misunderstandings, especially when multiple parties are involved.  

Torske has emphasized documentation throughout his career, including earlier work focused on research and technical writing, and later work coordinating job activities, work orders, and workflow systems.

“Documentation is not paperwork,” he says. “It’s how you keep promises measurable.”

Practical tip
After any decision call or site meeting, send a three-line recap: what was decided, who owns it, and the due date. Keep those notes in one place, like a single email subfile or shared folder.

If you only remember one thing

Most project problems come from unclear scope and unclear sequence. Write down the scope. Write down the order of work. Then confirm who owns each step.

Readers are encouraged to share this myth list with anyone planning a renovation or construction project in Calgary and try one tip today. Start with the simplest: write a three-step sequence for your next project conversation and confirm it in writing.

About David Torske

David Torske is a Calgary, Alberta-based Project Coordinator and Associate Project Manager specialising in scheduling, documentation, workflow optimization, and trade coordination for residential and commercial construction projects. He completed a Project Management in Construction Certificate at Mount Royal University and holds the Certified Associate in Project Management designation from the Project Management Institute.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Terra Ziolkowski Releases Free “15-Minute Mouth Check” Guide for Everyday Oral Health

Published

on

  • Terra Ziolkowski, a dental assistant in Miami, Florida, created a quick self-audit checklist to help people spot small issues early and keep a simple routine consistent.

Florida, US, 25th February 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Terra Ziolkowski has released a free resource for everyday individuals called the “15-Minute Mouth Check,” a one page self-audit and mini script designed to help people catch common oral health slip-ups before they become expensive problems.

The guide is built for real life. It uses short prompts, a simple checklist, and plain language notes that people can complete at home, then bring to their next dental visit if they choose.

“Most people do not need a complicated routine,” said Ziolkowski. “They need a routine they can actually repeat, even on busy days.”

The “15-Minute Mouth Check” includes:

  • A quick daily habit check (morning and night)

  • A gum and tooth scan you can do with a mirror and good lighting

  • A “what to mention at your next appointment” note section

  • A short script for asking clear questions at the dentist without feeling awkward

“Perfection is not the goal,” Ziolkowski added. “The goal is a routine you can keep when life gets messy.”

The real-world cost when small problems get ignored

Ziolkowski created the guide to address a common pattern: people delay care, rush routines, and only react when pain shows up. The costs can add up fast.

  • A single cavity filling can cost about $100 to $1,150 per tooth, depending on the situation and materials. 

  • A dental crown can range from about $800 to $2,500 per tooth without insurance. 

  • Emergency department dental visits average about $749 for patients who are not hospitalized, and ED care is often far more expensive than a dental office visit. 

  • Lost productivity time due to untreated dental disease is estimated at $45 billion per year in the U.S., tied to oral pain and unplanned dental visits. 

“People are often surprised that the basics still matter most,” said Ziolkowski. “This guide keeps the basics clear and easy.”

Use this in 15 minutes

Set a timer for 15 minutes. Grab a mirror and turn on bright lighting. No special tools needed.

  1. Check your routine (3 minutes)
    Circle what you actually do most days: brush once, brush twice, rush at night, skip between-teeth cleaning, snack late, fall asleep without brushing.

  2. Do a quick scan (6 minutes)
    Look for:

  • Gum bleeding when brushing

  • Sore spots

  • A tooth that feels sensitive to cold, sweet, or pressure

  • A spot you always miss (same side, same back tooth)

  1. Write your “next visit notes” (4 minutes)
    Use the guide’s prompts to jot:

  • Where it hurts or feels sensitive

  • How long it has been happening

  • What makes it better or worse

  1. Use the short script (2 minutes)
    Pick one question to bring to your next visit, such as:

  • “Can you show me the one spot I keep missing when I brush?”

  • “Is this sensitivity something I should treat now, or watch?”

  • “What is the simplest routine you want me to follow for the next 30 days?”

Common mistakes people make

Ziolkowski says the same issues show up again and again, even for people who care about their health.

  • Treating oral care like an all-or-nothing routine
    Doing nothing because you cannot do everything perfectly.

  • Brushing fast and skipping the gumline
    Speed usually means missed areas.

  • Waiting for pain before taking action
    Pain often shows up later than the problem.

  • Not asking questions at the dental visit
    People leave without a clear plan, then repeat the same habits.

“This is about small checks that prevent big problems,” Ziolkowski said. “You identify the simple change you can keep, and you stick with it long enough to see results.”

How to use the resource today

Use the “15-Minute Mouth Check” tonight or tomorrow morning. Complete the checklist once, write down two notes, and choose one small habit to keep for the next seven days. Then bring your notes to your next dental visit and read your questions directly from the script.

About Terra Ziolkowski

Terra Ziolkowski is a dental assistant based in Miami, Florida. She supports patients through chairside care, clear communication, and practical oral hygiene education focused on simple habits people can maintain.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

William Gee Issues Public Alert on a Costly Offshore Injury Trap: Treating Maritime Claims Like Workers’ Comp

Published

on

  • William Gee, a prominent trial lawyer in Lafayette, Louisiana, is urging offshore workers and families to avoid early mistakes that can quietly weaken a maritime injury claim.

Louisiana, US, 25th February 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, William Gee, Managing Partner of William Gee Law Firm, released a public alert aimed at offshore and maritime workers who are hurt on the job, as well as families trying to help them in the first days after an injury.

The alert focuses on a common and avoidable mistake: handling an offshore injury the way someone might handle a standard workers’ compensation claim, including giving quick recorded statements, signing early paperwork without review, or waiting too long to document what happened. Maritime claims can involve different rules, different timelines, and different ways liability is proven.

As a recent profile of Gee’s work put it, “offshore cases are not simple.” The same profile described a practice built on “specialize rather than generalize,” and on “preparation and persistence.” Those themes are part of what Gee wants the public to understand: the first steps after an offshore injury often shape everything that comes after.

Why this matters in plain numbers

These risks show up in a world where serious accidents remain common:

  • In 2023, the United States recorded 40,901 motor vehicle traffic fatalities.

  • In 2023, there were 5,283 fatal work injuries in the United States. 

  • Transportation incidents accounted for 36.8% of all occupational fatalities in 2023, or 1,942 deaths. 

  • In 2023, the U.S. Coast Guard counted 3,844 recreational boating accidents, including 564 deaths and 2,126 injuries.

  • CDC NIOSH notes commercial fishing is among the most dangerous jobs in the U.S., with a fatality rate over 28 times higher than the U.S. average during 2000–2017. 

Public alert: The trap to avoid

The trap is not just the injury. It is the early paper trail.

Offshore and maritime cases can turn on details that seem small at first: who supervised the work, what equipment was involved, whether the Jones Act applies, what training and safety steps were used, and how the first report described the incident. When those details are vague, rushed, or inconsistent, it can limit options later.

Self-check quiz: Are you at risk of this mistake?

Answer Yes or No:

  1. Did you give a recorded statement to anyone other than your own lawyer?

  2. Did you sign any document that mentions release, waiver, resignation, or “full and final” settlement?

  3. Did you delay medical care or skip a follow-up appointment after the initial visit?

  4. Did your first report of injury leave out key details about equipment, conditions, or witnesses?

  5. Were you told this is “just workers’ comp,” with no discussion of maritime rules or the Jones Act?

  6. Did you send texts or social posts about the incident that could be misunderstood out of context?

  7. Did you return to work before your condition was clearly documented by a medical provider?

  8. Did you rely on verbal promises about coverage, pay, or “taking care of it later”?

  9. Did you lose track of names of witnesses, vessel details, or the timeline of the shift?

  10. Did you assume the company’s process is designed to protect you first?

Quick scoring

  • 0–1 Yes: Lower risk. Keep documentation tight and stay consistent.

  • 2–4 Yes: Moderate risk. The claim may already be drifting off course.

  • 5+ Yes: High risk. Early missteps may be shaping the outcome.

What to do next: Simple decision tree

Start here:

  1. A) If you answered Yes to signing anything

  1. Stop signing new paperwork.

  2. Gather copies of everything you signed or were sent.

  3. Write a simple timeline: date, time, location, what happened, who saw it.

  4. Get legal guidance before any further statements or forms.

  1. B) If you answered Yes to a recorded statement

  1. Do not do a second statement “to clarify.”

  2. Request a copy or transcript if available.

  3. Write down what you remember saying while it is still fresh.

  4. Focus on medical documentation and facts, not explanations.

  1. C) If you answered Yes to delayed care or limited documentation

  1. Book a follow-up appointment and describe symptoms clearly.

  2. Keep a daily log for 14 days: pain, mobility, sleep, tasks you cannot do.

  3. Save all work schedules, travel records, and incident communications.

  4. Identify witnesses and write down how to contact them.

  1. D) If you answered Yes to “this is just workers’ comp”

  1. Treat that as a prompt to ask deeper questions about maritime options.

  2. Collect vessel or jobsite details: employer, contractors, vessel name if relevant.

  3. Preserve photos if you have them, including equipment and surroundings.

  4. Get counsel familiar with maritime and offshore injury law.

Gee is urging offshore workers and families to run the self-check today, then take simple steps to protect accuracy and documentation before the situation hardens into a record that is difficult to fix.

Run the self-check today and share it with a friend, coworker, or family member who works offshore.

About William Gee

William Gee is a prominent trial lawyer based in Lafayette, Louisiana. He is the Managing Partner of William Gee Law Firm and focuses on products liability, offshore and maritime injury cases, and serious car and truck collisions. He earned his J.D. from Tulane University Law School and studied economics and philosophy at Emory University. He led a legal team that obtained a $117 million jury verdict, the largest in Louisiana history for an injury case.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

LATEST POST