Press Release
Lumino Secure Multi-Party Computing: A New Generation Of Data Security Sharing Solution
The Dilemma Of Digital Economy
The most critical and cardinal element of the digital economy is data. Data is the “oil” of digital economy. Hence, utilizing the “data oil” safely and efficiently is the focal point of global economic digital transformation. On the one hand, the digital economy has entered a high-speed development age. The global digital economy has reached 36.2% of global GDP. It is necessary to open up the “data island” among enterprises and establish an open and shared digital resource environment. On the other hand, the public is paying more and more attention to personal privacy and data security, and regulators have introduced a series of regulations to ensure information security. For example, car companies buy parts back and assemble them into cars, the ownership belongs to the car companies, while parts manufacturers also make it clear that once the parts are sold to factories, the factories have ownership. But the data level is more sensitive. Personal data include the face, voice, name, height and other sensitive personal privacy specifics. How to define the ownership of the data between these parties? At present, there are no clear legal provisions, nor the industry has clear answers. In foreign practice, the EU has made very strict data protection regulations, but the entire EU data information technology industry lags behind China and the United States.
Because data protection is too strict, data from different sources do not interact, data is not open and can not interact to generate value and to improve the efficiency of the economy as a whole. The EU is not a good example, because it does not balance the relationship between data privacy protection and the development of the data industry.
Privacy protection and data security need multi-party promotion
Facing the dilemma of data security and sharing, the “available and invisible” secure multi-party computing provides us with an innovative solution.
Secure multi-party computing is a calculation process performed by multiple participants. Multi-party computing technology includes inadvertent transmission, secret sharing and confusing circuit. Multi-party computing has the advantage of high confidentiality and maneuverability, and each party has absolute control over the data it owns. Secure multi-party computing can be applied to networks where participants are not trusted. Participants can know the agreed results of collaborative computation, but they can’t get or deduce the original contents of the data. The flow of data and the collaborative analysis are of great value in all industries, and have brought about a lot of application demands. There are two main scenarios in the market:
1) Data security query
In the big data age, the data that the enterprise holds itself often cannot satisfy the demand of business analysis, many enterprises will purchase the external data to expand the data source. When an enterprise uses an external database to query, it faces the risk of divulging the query condition information. MPC technology helps enterprises to set up a secure query to obtain more external data under the condition of ensuring their own data security, thereby deepening the digital transformation and making better use of big data technology to optimize business.
2) Data joint analysis
Joint analysis often faces two headwinds. On one hand, it is illegal to trade personal privacy information. On the other hand, data sharing makes data-holding companies lose their competitive edge. MPC technology, through inadvertently querying, makes the data not public, the query object not exposed, and the results can be correctly given feedback for, which has an important application in the financial risk control business.
Lumino: new ideas for secure multi-party computing
Lumino is a large-scale activity that uses secure multi-party computing protocols to generate zero knowledge proof system public reference string (CRS) in a de-trust manner, and it is a prerequisite and an important step for deploying and using privacy-related applications in a decentralized ecosystem. The activity now focuses on the PLONK algorithm. As a practical and efficient zk-SNARK algorithm, PLONK is often used in blockchain projects and communities, which is characterized by only one-time initialization process, i. e. running once, it can be used to support a variety of underlying circuit logic and multi-class application deployment.
Lumino’s vision, from the start, was to link the world’s cryptographic geeks to become co-creators and witnesses of privacy computing infrastructure, not just an event but a ritual. We changed the method of centralizing system parameters into a distributed one. For a truly community-based and open-source blockchain ecosystem, each of which is the most critical link, and each participant who joins makes the bottom one safer, which would be a ceremonial collective wisdom.
Lumino is the cornerstone of subsequent de-centering privacy protection applications based on zero-knowledge proof, and the subsequent de-centralization applications will be safer only if the activity is safely completed.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
Gary Bassett: The Questions He Says Investors Should Ask Before They Commit Capital
- The Dallas fund manager says the questions an investor asks before writing a check matter more than the pitch they just heard.
A Different Starting Point
Dallas, Texas, November 11, 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Gary Bassett, Founder, Chairman, and Managing Partner of HP Capital Partners in Dallas, Texas, has spent more than four decades moving through investment banking, enterprise software, and institutional asset management. He built that path at J.P. Morgan, founded and scaled Microbank before its sale to Citicorp, and led an investment banking division at Bank of America before launching HP Capital Partners in 2012.
Across those decades, he says the investors who do well are not the ones with the best spreadsheets. They are the ones who ask a short list of plain questions before they commit money, and who actually wait for honest answers.
“Most pitches are built to survive a good question,” Bassett says. “They are not built to survive four in a row.”
What Happens When the Story Stops Being True
Bassett says the first question he asks about any strategy is what happens to it when the thesis behind it breaks.
“Every investment has a story attached to it,” he says. “Rates will fall, a sector will consolidate, a currency will move. The question is not whether the story is good. It is what the manager does on the day it stops being true.”
He says investors rarely ask this directly, and managers rarely volunteer the answer, because it forces a conversation about losses before any money has changed hands.
Who Actually Owns the Risk Decision
The second question Bassett raises is about governance rather than strategy: who has the authority to cut a position, and under what conditions.
“A strategy is only as good as the person with their hand on the risk lever,” he says. “I want to know if that person has the authority to act without a committee meeting first.”
He points to his own work at HP Capital Partners, where asset allocation and risk parameters sit under direct oversight rather than a layered approval process, as the standard he measures other structures against.
What a Track Record Leaves Out
Bassett says a strong track record is the easiest thing for an investor to be shown and the hardest thing to read correctly.
“A five-year return number tells you almost nothing about how that return was earned,” he says. “It does not tell you how much leverage was used, how concentrated the positions were, or how the manager behaved in the one bad quarter that got smoothed over in the average.”
He says he asks managers to walk through their single worst period in detail rather than their best one, because the worst period shows how a strategy actually fails.
How It Fits With Everything Else Already Owned
The last question Bassett raises is one he says most individual investors skip entirely: how a new position interacts with everything already in the portfolio.
“People evaluate investments one at a time, as if each one exists in isolation,” he says. “It never does. A great strategy can still be the wrong addition if it moves the same way as everything else you already hold.”
He says this question matters more in periods when markets move together across asset classes, since diversification on paper can disappear exactly when it is needed most.
Questions Before Comfort
Bassett says none of these four questions are complicated, and that is the point.
“The goal is not to sound sophisticated,” he says. “The goal is to know what you actually own, and what it will do when conditions change. Most of the damage I have seen over the years came from a question that never got asked, not an answer nobody could have known.”
He says the habit of asking before committing carries over from his own background: the diligence standards built at J.P. Morgan, the operational discipline required to scale Microbank across banking and construction clients worldwide, and the risk oversight he now runs directly at HP Capital Partners.
“Capital markets reward patience with questions more than they reward confidence in answers,” he says. “That has not changed in forty-five years, and I do not expect it to change now.”
About Gary Bassett
Gary Bassett is the Founder, Chairman, and Managing Partner of HP Capital Partners, an investment firm based in Dallas, Texas. His career spans investment banking at J.P. Morgan, the founding and sale of Microbank Software Inc. to Citicorp, and a tenure as Managing Director of Investment Banking at Bank of America. He is a longtime resident of Highland Park, Texas, and a member of the Dallas Hall Society at Southern Methodist University.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
Ralph Opacic Says Arts Programs Disappear First When School Budgets Shrink
- Ralph Opacic, founder of Orange County School of the Arts and now chief executive of Orange County Music & Dance, says arts education keeps losing when budgets tighten, and argues that funding built to survive a downturn matters more than any single grant or gift.
A Pattern He Has Watched for Decades
Santa Ana, California, November 11, 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Ralph Opacic founded Orange County School of the Arts in 1987, during a period when school districts across California were cutting arts programs to protect core academic budgets. He has watched the same pattern repeat in every downturn since.
“When money gets tight, arts programs are usually the first line item someone circles,” Opacic said. “That’s true in public schools and it’s true in nonprofits. It isn’t because people don’t value the arts. It’s because arts programs often don’t have funding built to outlast a bad year.”
Opacic says that pattern gets too little attention outside the arts world itself. Parents notice when a program disappears. Few ask why it was vulnerable in the first place.
Funding Built to Survive a Downturn
OCSA grew in part because it became a tuition-free option at a time when other schools and districts were retreating from arts education. The Orange County School of the Arts Foundation, a separate 501(c)(3) that Opacic has also led since 1988, was built specifically to keep tuition-free access intact regardless of what was happening in any single district’s budget.
“A school that depends entirely on one funding source is one bad year away from cutting the program,” Opacic said. “A foundation, an endowment, a board that treats fundraising as part of the mission and not an afterthought, that’s what lets a program keep its doors open when the money gets harder to find.”
At Orange County Music & Dance, where Opacic now serves as chief executive, the organization has built a $5 million endowment specifically so that no student is priced out of its classes. Opacic points to that structure as the kind of planning that keeps programming intact through economic cycles rather than shrinking every time one hits.
What Gets Overlooked
Opacic says the conversation about arts education tends to focus on programming: what classes are offered, what the student outcomes look like, which students get into which conservatories. Less attention goes to the financial architecture underneath it.
“Everyone wants to talk about the recital or the student who got into a great program,” he said. “Almost nobody asks how the organization is going to fund that same opportunity for the next ten years, or the next recession. That’s the question that actually determines whether a program survives.”
He says institutions that want to serve students over the long run need to treat fundraising and financial planning as part of the educational mission, not a separate administrative task handled after the fact.
A Pathway From Early Childhood Through Adulthood
Opacic says the funding question matters even more as arts organizations try to serve students across a longer span of their lives. Orange County Music & Dance now offers programming for children as young as six months through adult classes, alongside pre-conservatory and conservatory tracks for middle and high school performers.
“If you want a pathway that starts in early childhood and continues into adulthood, you can’t fund it one grant cycle at a time,” Opacic said. “You need a structure that’s still standing in fifteen years, not just this fall.”
About Ralph Opacic
Ralph S. Opacic, Ed.D., founded Orange County School of the Arts in Santa Ana, California, in 1987 and led the school as president and executive director until 2021. He also founded and led the Orange County School of the Arts Foundation, West Coast School of the Arts, Pacific Coast Dance Fest, and West Coast Musical Theatre Company. Opacic currently serves as chief executive of Orange County Music & Dance in Irvine, California, and has consulted with the DeVos Institute of Arts Management at the Kennedy Center. He holds a doctorate in education from the University of Southern California.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
Press Release
Ryan Basnaw Debunks 5 Myths That Cost Construction Companies Time and Money
- Ryan Basnaw, CEO of Axsus Civil Development Company in Idaho, shares the truths behind common construction management misconceptions.
Why Construction Myths Persist
Idaho, USA, November 11, 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Construction companies lose thousands of hours each year to outdated beliefs that sound logical but fail in practice. These myths spread because they are easy to repeat and hard to challenge without real-world evidence. Ryan Basnaw, CEO of Axsus Civil Development Company, has built his career on testing assumptions and replacing guesswork with systems that work. He developed PM Axsus, a construction management platform designed to address the gaps left by traditional methods. Below, he corrects five myths that continue to mislead contractors.
Myth One: Documentation Slows Down Projects
Many teams believe that stopping to document work creates delays. They assume the fastest path forward is to keep moving without pausing to record details. This myth persists because documentation feels like extra work that does not contribute to visible progress.
The reality is different. Basnaw experienced this firsthand when a project required significant rework because an inspector did not document the work correctly. “A project required significant rework due to inspector not documenting our work correctly. Now we document everything so inspectors can never claim they didn’t know something when it happened,” he explains. Documentation protects projects from costly rework and keeps everyone accountable.
Practical tip: Before leaving any job site, take two minutes to photograph completed work and log the date, time, and crew members present. Store these records in a shared folder accessible to your entire team.
Myth Two: Big Ideas Drive Success
There is a widespread belief that breakthrough ideas separate successful companies from struggling ones. People think innovation alone creates momentum and that the best businesses are built on unique concepts. This myth thrives because big ideas are exciting and easy to celebrate.
Basnaw takes a different view. “I don’t believe ideas have much value unless they solve a real problem,” he says. The construction management platform PM Axsus was built not around a clever concept but around real pain points in time tracking, fleet management, and cost tracking. Solutions matter more than novelty.
Practical tip: Before investing time in a new process or tool, write down the specific problem it solves. If you cannot name a real issue your team faces daily, the idea is not ready.
Myth Three: Success Means Working Harder
The construction industry often equates long hours with achievement. People assume that the hardest workers earn the most success and that there is no substitute for putting in extra time. This myth endures because effort is visible and easy to measure.
Basnaw challenges this definition. “Success is having the freedom to do what I want with my time. That’s always been my definition. Building a business is important, but I don’t think success is only measured by revenue or job titles. It’s about creating something that gives you choices and allows you to spend your time where it matters most,” he explains. Systems and consistency matter more than hours logged.
Practical tip: Identify one task you do manually each week that could be automated or delegated. Commit to eliminating it within the next 30 days so you can redirect that time toward planning or growth.
Myth Four: Consistency Is Less Important Than Intensity
Many leaders believe that occasional bursts of focused effort produce better results than steady daily habits. They think major pushes during crunch time compensate for gaps in routine. This myth holds on because dramatic effort feels more impressive than quiet repetition.
The evidence points elsewhere. “I’ve learned that consistency and attention to detail make the biggest difference over time. Small habits repeated every day create better outcomes than occasional bursts of effort,” Basnaw notes. Systems built on daily routines outlast short-term sprints.
Practical tip: Choose one small habit tied to project quality or team communication. Commit to doing it at the same time every day for two weeks. Track your completion rate in a simple checklist.
Myth Five: Admitting You Don’t Know Something Weakens Your Authority
Construction leaders often worry that acknowledging gaps in their knowledge will undermine their credibility. They assume their team expects them to have every answer and that uncertainty signals weakness. This myth persists because leadership is often confused with infallibility.
Basnaw sees it differently. “Never be too proud to admit you don’t know something,” he advises. Asking questions and seeking input builds stronger teams and prevents avoidable mistakes. Authority comes from making good decisions, not from pretending to know everything.
Practical tip: The next time a team member asks you a question you cannot answer, respond with, “I don’t know, but let’s figure it out together.” Model the behavior you want to see in your team.
If You Only Remember One Thing
Documentation protects your projects, consistency beats intensity, and admitting what you don’t know strengthens your leadership. Success is not about working longer hours or chasing big ideas. It is about building systems that solve real problems and give you the freedom to spend your time where it matters most.
Share This List and Try One Tip Today
Pick one myth from this list and apply the practical tip this week. Share this article with another contractor or project manager who could benefit from rethinking these common assumptions. Small changes repeated over time create better outcomes than waiting for the perfect moment to overhaul everything at once.
About Ryan Basnaw
Ryan Basnaw is CEO of Axsus Civil Development Company, a civil construction firm specializing in site work, grading, sewer and water systems, irrigation, storm systems, and turnkey subdivision and commercial civil construction. Based in Idaho, he developed PM Axsus, a construction management platform designed to help contractor-based businesses manage time tracking, fleet management, inspections, scheduling, materials, and project costs. He holds degrees in engineering and petroleum engineering and is a member of the Association of General Contractors.
About Author
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
-
Press Release4 days ago
ElectionBuddy Announces New Voting Features and Platform Enhancements
-
Press Release4 days ago
Create a Lasting Legacy Ferdinand J. Ruano Arroyo’s Newly Released Book Helps Everyday Investors Build Long-Term Wealth
-
Press Release5 days ago
ALLCOM Smart Tumbler to Launch on Kickstarter, Bringing Temperature Control to Everyday Drinks
-
Press Release5 days ago
Born in the Exam Room, a Korean Skincare Brand Meets the World in Hong Kong
-
Press Release1 week ago
Beyond the $40 Billion RWA Headline: Drofa Comms × RWA Summit Report Identifies Four Challenges for 2027
-
Press Release5 days ago
Puttist to Launch Putt-Pool on Kickstarter, Bringing the Fun of Pool to Golf Putting
-
Press Release4 days ago
Holiday Party Hair: Bon Bon Hair Salon & Spa of Scottsdale Gets Guests Event-Ready
-
Press Release4 days ago
Soult Introduces the World’s First Secure Digital Life Vault in the UAE
