Connect with us

Press Release

LikeLib2.0 Technical Features, Redefining Public Chain

Published

on

Based on the country’s strategy to promote the development of blockchain, we focus on the core issues of blockchain applications in various fields, take typical blockchain applications as an important breakthrough, promote breakthroughs in key application technologies of blockchain, and study blockchain service architecture, data Key technologies such as access technology, hybrid storage, data source, cross-chain and sharding, blockchain and IoT intelligent system integration, and develop a basic platform for blockchain services, in blockchain education and training, e-government, supply chain, and carry out application demonstrations in key areas such as finance to open up the innovation chain, application chain and value chain, thus providing common and secure blockchain basic support capabilities.

Recently the technical features of LikeLib2.0 public chain system are announced through the media.

LikeLib2.0 provides a secure and stable blockchain service basic platform, covering more than 3 core modules with independent intellectual property rights, such as data connection, hybrid storage, and cross-chain technology, which is able to quickly build solutions for typical application scenarios.

Compared with LikeLib1.0, LikeLib2.0 has a higher level of improvement in core technology architecture, and the transaction speed is about 10000TPS.

The newly released 2.0 system will not only merge transaction program fees, but also copy forks of the blockchain and increase the volume of transfer transactions. The average transaction value can be distributed among the running nodes.

In addition, there have been steady improvements in supporting smart contracts, exchangeable consensus mechanisms, and various storage networks. It can replace the blockchain consensus mechanism and the basic IPFS distributed storage network according to different factors (such as transaction volume), which can store a large amount of data outside the chain.

LikeLib2.0 uses database fragmentation technology. Within the database of LikeLib2.0 public chain system, only a small part of the input transactions need to be processed, and a large amount of verification work can be completed through other conventional parallel processing on the network.

Here, BTC and LikeLib seem to be merchants from two countries. The two parties cannot trust each other and use different currencies, so they cannot directly trade.

Therefore, the two parties negotiated a set of rules (equivalent to a relay chain protocol) and established a special trading venue to handle transactions, jointly managed by large merchants (equivalent to gateways) in their own country as representatives. These large merchants also need to have a sufficient amount of assets as security.

The whole process is called a cross-chain bridge, which has technical advantages such as multi-signature technology/ring signature technology/hash locking.

LikeLib2.0 uses Lightning Network transactions and zero configuration transaction channels.

Both parties transfer funds to a common payment channel and conduct transactions by transferring funds from one end to the other. The existing hosting solutions on the Lightning Network only manage their users’ funds on one or a few, and they will not use one channel with each user. Instead, an internal private ledger is kept to record when the funds belong to the user.

Therefore, users do not have to wait for the payment channel to be broadcast to the chain. The result is a decentralized network of custodians, with each custodian running a centralized subnet with users.

Earlier we mentioned the ring signature technology in the LikeLib2.0 cross-chain bridge. The ring signature is named because a certain parameter implicit in the signature is composed according to certain rules. However, many schemes proposed later do not require the structure of the signature to be a ring, as long as the formation of the signature satisfies the spontaneity, anonymity and group characteristics, and it is also called a ring signature.

In fact, the security of the ring signature technology scheme is quite high, such as: unconditional anonymity, unforgeability, unconditional anonymity of the signer, and the signer can freely specify his own anonymity range, forming a beautiful ring logic structure, which can realize group signatures The main function of but does not require trusted third parties or group administrators.

Ring signature is a special group signature. There is no trusted center and no group establishment process. For the verifier, the signer is completely anonymous.

In terms of zero-knowledge proofs, in theory, it is possible to prove something to everyone else without exposing anything significant, and the volume of the generated proof is small, the proof cost is very low, and it has nothing to do with the amount of calculation that needs to be proved.

LikeLib2.0 uses the generation algorithm (G) to generate public parameters for the proposition, the proof algorithm (P) to generate the proof of the satisfiability of R1CS, and the verification algorithm (V) to verify the proof and other technical methods and means to finally generate the proof. It can be proved that there is a secret value reset equation satisfied without revealing the secret.

Data traceability, from the perspective of application, focuses on the process and method of tracking.

The “decentralized and distributed” technology of LikeLib2.0 records all information publicly on the “public ledger”, and can only be entered and cannot be modified. Due to the feature of multiple parties jointly maintaining the simultaneous ledger, the traditional information island problem is broken and decentralized management is realized.

In this open distributed accounting system, the blockchain provides users with openness and consensus; decentralized and transparent transactions and anonymity for both parties.

The data traceability annotation is a technique for tracing the source, reproduce the historical state and evolution process of the data according to the trace path, and realize the redirection of the historical data archives.

The World Wide Web has continued to iterate for thirty years before it has today’s prosperity and “Internet +”. If we still have confidence in the blockchain in 2020, perhaps we should give it more time. Obviously, the LikeLib2.0 public chain system has given the blockchain industry a gratifying answer in 2020.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Paul Bowman Knoxville Brings Historical Discipline to Nonprofit Leadership

Published

on

Tennessee, US, 1st February 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Paul Bowman of Knoxville views fundraising through the lens of a historian. For over thirty years, he has brought structure, continuity, and a deep respect for precedent to the nonprofit world. His leadership style reflects his training as a history instructor and his long experience in development roles across higher education, social services, and faith-based foundations.

Educated at Lee University and the University of Memphis, Bowman has spent much of his career helping organizations plan for the future while honoring the past. He sees parallels between historical research and fundraising strategy: both demand thorough documentation, context awareness, and long-term thinking.

“In history, you don’t act on guesses,” Bowman says. “You document sources, understand timelines, and look at cause and effect. Fundraising is the same.”

As a nonprofit executive, Bowman uses this approach to guide policy, engage donors, and design fundraising systems that endure beyond any one campaign. He believes sustainable development depends on more than charisma or urgency. It requires institutional memory, consistent planning, and clear records—principles rooted in his academic discipline.

This mindset has shaped Bowman’s leadership at the Holston Conference Foundation, where he served as President and CEO. There, he helped build endowment strategies and legacy programs that reflected both donor intent and organizational goals. His work ensured that gifts aligned with mission, documentation supported decisions, and communication remained steady at every stage.

Bowman also brings historical insight into board development and team training. He encourages organizations to see fundraising not as a series of transactions, but as a process shaped by culture, values, and past decisions. When new leaders or staff members join, he supports onboarding that includes historical context. What commitments have been made? What strategies have worked? Where have shifts occurred?

This level of depth helps organizations avoid repeating mistakes or discarding effective practices. It also strengthens trust with donors, who see that their contributions are part of a thoughtful, consistent framework.

Bowman’s teaching experience reinforces his communication skills. As an adjunct history instructor, he has worked with students online and in person, translating complex topics into clear takeaways. That same clarity defines his donor outreach. He avoids jargon and focuses on shared understanding. Whether discussing a major gift or a planned legacy, Bowman ensures both sides know what to expect.

His approach does not rely on trends. It rests on structure. That makes it resilient—especially in times of transition or uncertainty. By grounding leadership in context and continuity, Bowman helps nonprofits stay focused on mission and purpose, even as goals evolve.

About Paul Bowman
Paul Bowman Knoxville is a nonprofit executive and history instructor with over three decades of experience in development leadership. His career spans higher education, social services, and faith-based foundations. Known for his structured and transparent approach, Bowman helps organizations build lasting fundraising programs rooted in clarity and context.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

REI Accelerator Champions the Rise of Creator-Led Capital in Real Estate

Published

on

  • From Austin, Texas, REI Accelerator is helping content creators turn trust into investment capital—one deal at a time.

Austin, TX, 1st February 2026, ZEX PR WIREREI Accelerator is raising awareness around a fast-growing shift in the real estate industry: the rise of creator-led capital. With more creators building loyal audiences through YouTube, podcasts, newsletters, and social platforms, a growing number are now turning that trust into real estate investing power.

“The best fundraisers today aren’t always from finance,” said a spokesperson from REI Accelerator. “They’re the ones who’ve been teaching, sharing, and showing up for their audience for years. Capital is following trust.”

According to REI Accelerator Reviews, the trend is clear. Creators with small but loyal followings are quietly raising hundreds of thousands, even millions, in private capital without traditional marketing funnels. This model flips the script on outdated fundraising methods by putting education and transparency first.

The Data Behind the Trend

The creator economy is now worth over $250 billion globally, with more than 50 million people identifying as creators. At the same time, platforms like CrowdStreet report that 70% of real estate deals now involve direct-to-investor outreach, signaling a shift away from exclusive capital networks.

This new wave of entrepreneurs isn’t selling courses. They’re structuring deals.

“We work with creators who don’t want to sell hype,” said REI Accelerator. “They want to offer real value. We help them build clean systems and raise money the right way.”

Empowering Everyday Experts to Enter REI

REI Accelerator is using its platform to help more creators understand how to raise capital legally and effectively. That includes:

  • Educating on SEC-compliant deal structures

  • Coaching on investor communications and expectations

  • Helping creators avoid common legal and branding mistakes

  • Supporting scalable fundraising with systems that grow with them

“Most of the creators we help have never raised a dollar before,” shared REI Accelerator Reviews. “But they have an audience that trusts them. That’s a better starting point than cold leads.”

Why This Matters

This model opens the door for a more inclusive investor class. Instead of relying on family money or legacy networks, creators can build their own communities and fund their own deals.

It also helps investors feel more connected. People want to back people they know—not just faceless operators.

“The creators we work with are transparent,” REI Accelerator said. “They show their process. They share their numbers. That builds real confidence.”

Call to Action: Start Building Trust Before Capital

REI Accelerator isn’t calling for more ads or funnels. Their advice is simple:

Start sharing before you start raising.

  • Post content that teaches.

  • Build a waitlist early.

  • Talk about what you’re learning.

  • Keep it real.

  • Grow slow and steady.

“Raising capital doesn’t start with a pitch,” they say. “It starts with showing up. The rest follows.”

About REI Accelerator

REI Accelerator is a real estate coaching and systems-building program that helps new operators scale with confidence. Based in Austin, Texas, the company specializes in helping investors set up repeatable deal systems, raise private capital responsibly, and lead with integrity. REI Accelerator Reviews have made the program a trusted name for content creators, solo GPs, and new fund managers who want to build long-term success—without the hype.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Gary Mazin Highlights How System Strain Is Affecting Toronto Residents

Published

on

  • Gary Mazin of Toronto, Canada, outlines how broader pressures in the personal injury system are being felt at a local level.

Toronto, Canada, 1st February 2026, ZEX PR WIREOngoing strain across Canada’s civil justice and healthcare systems is having a direct and growing impact on individuals in the Greater Toronto Area, according to Gary Mazin, owner of Mazin & Associates. Drawing on his experience in personal injury law, Mazin is pointing to how national and provincial pressures are translating into everyday realities for local residents.

“People experience these systems locally, not in the abstract,” Mazin says. “What happens at a national level shows up in neighbourhood timelines, hospital visits, and court schedules.”

How a Broader Issue Shows Up Locally

In Ontario, civil court backlogs remain elevated. Publicly available data indicate that civil matters in the Toronto region are taking 25–35% longer to move through early stages than they did before 2020. Some personal injury-related proceedings are taking 6 to 12 months longer than earlier averages.

Healthcare capacity is also a factor. In the Toronto Central region, wait times for certain non-emergency assessments have increased by approximately 18–22% year over year, adding layers of delay to already complex processes.

“Stress doesn’t disappear,” Mazin notes. “It accumulates. You see it most clearly in large urban centres like Toronto.”

Digital communication has become dominant as well. Estimates suggest that more than 70% of legal and administrative communication in Ontario is now handled electronically. While this has increased access, it has also raised expectations for speed that systems cannot always meet.

“Speed on the surface doesn’t equal progress underneath,” Mazin says. “Technology changes the interface, not the structure.”

Why Local Context Matters

Outcome variability has widened in recent years. Regional comparisons suggest that similar matters in the GTA now show outcome ranges 10–15% broader than they did five years ago, reflecting inconsistent timelines and procedural differences.

“People want certainty,” Mazin says. “But the system is more layered now than it used to be.”

Administrative requirements have also expanded. Documentation demands tied to injury-related matters in Ontario have grown by an estimated 15–20%, increasing the burden on individuals navigating the process.

“Complexity doesn’t make headlines,” Mazin adds. “But it shapes the experience.”

Local Action List: What Exists at the Community Level

The following reflects common local-level actions and touchpoints currently available in Toronto, rather than recommendations:

  1. Reviewing publicly available court scheduling updates for the Toronto region

  2. Monitoring Ontario Health wait-time dashboards

  3. Accessing community legal education materials offered by local organisations

  4. Attending virtual or in-person public legal information sessions

  5. Using hospital patient relations offices for processing information

  6. Consulting publicly funded legal information clinics

  7. Tracking case status through official online portals

  8. Reading Ontario court procedural guides

  9. Comparing regional service timelines published by provincial bodies

  10. Staying informed through local civic and legal reporting

Finding Trustworthy Local Resources

Trustworthy local resources typically share clear sourcing, transparent authorship, and alignment with official provincial or municipal information. In Toronto, these often include government websites, hospital networks, court communications, and recognised community legal organisations. Cross-referencing information across multiple local sources can also help individuals understand how broader issues apply locally.

Mazin emphasises that while these pressures are not unique to Toronto, scale magnifies their impact.

“The system rewards understanding,” he says. “Not assumptions.”

Call to Action
Readers are encouraged to identify one local information source or community-level step today to better understand how broader system changes affect them where they live.

About Gary Mazin

Gary Mazin is the owner and principal lawyer of Mazin & Associates, a personal injury law firm based in Toronto, Canada. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Toronto, a law degree from Osgoode Hall Law School, and an MBA from the Schulich School of Business at York University. Originally from the former Soviet Union, Mazin is known for his structured, process-driven approach to law, business, and leadership.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

LATEST POST