Connect with us

Press Release

CE officially launched, allowing users to enjoy the global inclusive financial dividend

Published

6 years ago

on

Foreword: Token economy is a part of blockchain technology, and tokens play an important role in the token economy. The current token economy will bestow value on token, so the blockchain technology must first land in the financial field.

CE will launch with glory, and it will burst with great value based on solving industry pain points.

Circular Economy, the first one-stop platform for decentralized circular economy supported by the Ethereum network, will be officially launched on November 7, 2020. The purpose is to solve the disadvantages and pain points of the current traditional centralized finance. As we all know that the traditional centralized financial institutions have gathered a large amount of social wealth and social resources, but at the same time, it has very serious drawbacks.

1. The centralized structure occupies a large amount of social trust, but its internal operations and decision-making are very opaque.

2. The centralized giant company monopolize oligarch dividends, and it is difficult for the public to participate in the development dividends of inclusive finance.

3. The centralized financial institutions have redundant processes and high operating costs.

The original intention of CE is to establish a set of scientific and secure decentralized financial inclusive smart contracts, allowing users to get the monopoly dividends originally occupied by centralized institutions. At the same time, the organization is operated by a third-party smart contract with open sources. So users can safely deposit assets to smart contracts for management.

 CECOIN-Ecological Token of CE 

In the CE ecosystem, tokens play a very important role. As an important link to maintain the operation of the CE ecosystem, CECOIN is a guarantee for the formation of a closed loop of the large ecosystem, carrying the important role of value circulation, purchasing services, obtaining returns, and encouraging interaction. It can be used in a variety of scenarios under the CE ecosystem. At the same time, the combination of CECOIN and CE shows the innovative highlights of CE:

  1. Catering to the trend of DEFI, the financial protocol built on Ethereum has a more systematic and secure basic carrier than TRON. Currently, Ethereum is the world’s largest ecological blockchain project, which can eliminate the hidden dangers of centralization and realizing the true decentralization autonomy.

2. It is the first time to combine financial experiments with governance tokens, so that participants can obtain CECOIN tokens for free and enjoy excess financial benefits while enjoying CE benefits.

CE is a circular economy protocol built on the Etherum network, aiming to allow global participants to have a fantastic experience of inclusive finance under the blockchain revolution with blockchain smart contracts. CE has established a set of scientific and secure inclusive financial participation protocol through blockchain Distributed Ledger Technology. Users can participate in the benefits of CE in the layout of economic cycle system under the security guarantee of blockchain technology. Due to the immutability and transparency of blockchain technology, users’ assets will be fully delivered, managed and distributed by smart contracts, and can be deposit or withdrawn at any time. No one (even the CE founding team) can tamper with and take away the assets of users on the blockchain. CE really enables the public to participate in global Inclusive Finance simply and safely.

In addition, circular economy has a clear business planning layout, and will create a one-stop platform for Defi business such as decentralized lending, asset on chain and DEX!

Conclusion: For the CE ecology, this is just the beginning. As it continues to evolve, more and more partners will participate in the CE ecology, such as traditional industries, authoritative institutions, etc., which will continue to add more values on CE and CECOIN. Although its development is still in an early stage, there is still a huge space of CE and CECOIN for value growth. CE is supported by technology. When it is about to go online, it has attracted close attention in the market, which is enough to show that CE is bound to burst into great value in the near future!

About Author

Alex Jacob

Alex Jacob is a literature author. He was born in Chicago. Alex passion is writing news articles. He writes number of articles and published it.

See author's posts

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Press Release

Energy drinks: $83 billion category, zero global quality benchmark. Until now.

Published

4 minutes ago

on

May 27, 2026

By

A new independent global ranking has exposed something the industry preferred to leave unexamined: energy drinks are not one category. They are two – and the divide runs straight down the Atlantic.

MONTREAL, QC – 27/05/2026 – (SeaPRwire) – When you pick up an energy drink in Frankfurt, you are most likely picking up a pasteurised beverage made with real sugar, a meaningful vitamin stack, and an ingredient list short enough to read in under ten seconds. When you pick up what is marketed as the same product category in Houston, you are, in all statistical likelihood, drinking an artificially sweetened, chemically preserved formulation that bears almost no resemblance to its European equivalent beyond the can format and the caffeine content. Same shelf. Same category name. Fundamentally different product.

This is not a matter of opinion or consumer preference. It is now a matter of documented fact – and the study that documented it, published this month by independent German beverage professional Pat Eckert under the banner of the Six Continents Index (SCI), is the first serious attempt anyone has made to compare energy drinks on a global basis using objective, measurable criteria.

The findings are striking enough on their own terms. But their broader implication – that the world’s largest energy drink market has, over time, quietly optimised for margin rather than product quality – raises questions that go well beyond any single study.

What an energy drink is supposed to be

The category is older than most people assume. The correct answer is Japan, 1962, when Lipovitan-D was launched as a functional health tonic for a hardworking, health-conscious, largely white-collar population – built around a clear physiological promise, with sugar as one of its core ingredients. The global spread of the format came later, and with it, in certain markets, a gradual drift from that original intent.

Before examining what the study found, it is worth asking what a consumer actually expects from an energy drink. The answer covers several things: sustained energy, immediate alertness, and functional support from vitamins and other active ingredients. But the foundation – the one the category name is built on – is energy itself, and that has a specific physiological meaning. Carbohydrates, including sugar, are the primary fuel source for both the body and the brain. Glucose is what muscles run on and what the brain demands in quantity when concentration and alertness are required. An energy drink that contains no sugar – or that replaces it entirely with artificial sweeteners that deliver sweetness without caloric content – is not, in any meaningful sense, an energy drink. It is a flavoured caffeine delivery mechanism.

This is not a fringe position. It is basic nutritional science, and it matters when evaluating a category in which “zero” and “sugar-free” variants have proliferated to the point where, in some markets, they now represent the majority of shelf space. The logic of drinking a zero-energy product and expecting an energy outcome is roughly equivalent to ordering a decaffeinated coffee and expecting to feel alert. The category name is making a promise. In many cases, the formulation is not keeping it.

The SCI was not a desk exercise. Eckert and his team spent roughly six months collecting energy drinks from all six inhabited continents – not just the obvious markets of the United States, Germany, UK and Japan, but extending to Nepal, Kenya, Mauritius, Chile, New Zealand, and dozens of markets in between. The result was a sample spanning virtually every corner of the global category, assembled product by product, market by market. The assessment framework applied to each of them covered 36 criteria: for example caffeine content and declaration, sugar quantity and type, sugar-to-caffeine balance, vitamin content, preservation method, label readability, packaging integrity, traceability, and label transparency – built around what a consumer has a reasonable right to expect from a product in this category. No taste testing, no jury votes, no brand popularity or marketing spend factored into the score. Only what could be objectively verified on the product itself. Top-performing products were submitted for independent Swiss laboratory analysis to validate what the label claimed.

A category, or two categories sharing a name?

The continental findings of the SCI read less like a market analysis and more like a study of two parallel industries that happen to use the same distribution channel.

In Europe, 85.7 per cent of energy drinks assessed had been pasteurised – the same heat-treatment process used in quality food and beverage production for over a century, and one that eliminates the need for artificial preservatives. In North America, that figure was 12 per cent. In Asia, 78.9 per cent of products used real sugar. In North America, 8 per cent did. Some 84 per cent of North American energy drinks relied entirely on artificial sweeteners – a figure that stood at 4.2 per cent in Europe and was near zero across Asia, Australia, South America, and Africa. Australian products averaged 4.2 vitamins per serving; North American products averaged 2.9.

The analogy that comes to mind is beer. The craft movement of the past two decades has repeatedly made the point that mass-market lager and a carefully brewed artisanal ale are related by category name and little else. The beverage industry has also seen the rise of alcohol-free beer – a product that answers a real consumer need, occupies the same shelf, and uses the same brand architecture as its alcoholic counterpart. Nobody seriously argues that non-alcoholic beer is the ‘real’ beer, however. Real beer has alcohol. Real wine has alcohol. Real energy drinks, by the logic of their own name, should have energy – meaning, above all, carbohydrates. The zero-sugar variant is a legitimate product with a legitimate market. But it should not be confused with the article it is imitating.

The health debate around energy drinks follows a similar pattern of category confusion. Concerns about the category are frequently generalised from the worst-formulated examples to the entire shelf. This is not a methodology that would be applied to any other food or beverage category. A sausage made with poor-quality mechanically recovered meat and a high preservative load is a different product from one made with high-welfare pork, natural casings, and no additives beyond salt and spice – yet both sit in the same supermarket aisle under the same category label. The relevant question is not whether sausages are healthy or unhealthy. It is what is in this sausage. The same logic applies to energy drinks, and it is the logic the SCI was built to apply.

Quantity matters independently of quality. Three litres of an entirely natural chicken broth will make most people feel unwell. This is not an argument against chicken broth. Overconsumption of almost anything produces negative outcomes. The energy drink category has suffered from a persistent conflation of formulation concerns with consumption concerns, and the result has been a debate that generates more heat than light. What the SCI provides, for the first time, is a framework for the formulation question specifically – separating it from consumption patterns and allowing product quality to be evaluated on its own merits.

North America’s uncomfortable result

The SCI ranked North America last overall among the six continental regions assessed. For the world’s largest energy drink market by revenue, this is a result that demands some explanation.

The most plausible one is competitive economics. The North American energy drink market is extraordinarily concentrated, with the top two or three brands together commanding the large majority of category revenue. In a market that competitive, the pressure on all participants is to protect margin. Artificial sweeteners cost a fraction of real sugar. Synthetic preservatives are cheaper than pasteurisation infrastructure. Vitamin inclusion adds cost without necessarily driving volume in a consumer environment where the functional credential of “energy” is dominated by caffeine and sweetness perception rather than by the full ingredient profile.

The result is a market that has, over decades of intense competition, rationalised its way to formulations that serve producer economics more reliably than consumer nutritional expectations. This is not unique to energy drinks – it is a well-documented dynamic in high-competition FMCG categories generally. But it is notable that it has occurred in the market that, by revenue, appears to be winning.

Europe, meanwhile, has retained formulation practices that are closer to the original product concept. Pasteurisation remains the norm. Real sugar remains the primary sweetener for the majority of products. The vitamin stack is fuller. This is partly a function of regulatory environment – the EU maintains stricter standards on certain additives than the FDA – and partly a function of a market that developed somewhat later and in a more competitive multi-brand environment from the outset, leaving less room for the cost-reduction trajectories that concentrated markets tend to produce.

Finally, a rating system

The beverage industry has long had objective quality frameworks for wine, mineral water, and spirits. Cars are safety-rated. Hotels are star-classified. Food products carry nutritional scoring systems of varying sophistication across different markets. Energy drinks – a category worth approximately $83 billion in global retail value in 2025, forecast to approach $116 billion by 2030 – have had none of this. Consumers buying an energy drink have had no independent, methodologically transparent basis for comparing what they were buying against alternatives. Marketing spend, shelf placement, and brand familiarity have filled the gap.

The SCI does not fill that gap entirely – it is a first assessment, not a permanent institutional framework, and its methodology will no doubt be interrogated and refined over time. But it establishes the principle that the category can be evaluated objectively, and that the results of that evaluation are both informative and commercially significant.

The question of aspartame illustrates why this matters. The sweetener – classified by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, a Group 2B classification – appeared in 10.5 per cent of products assessed globally, with 43 per cent of those aspartame-containing products found in Africa. The classification does not mean aspartame causes cancer; it means the evidence is sufficient to warrant ongoing scrutiny. A consumer with access to that information might reasonably prefer a product that does not use it. Until now, there has been no systematic global tool for identifying which products do and do not.

The brand at the top of the table

The highest-scoring brand in the SCI – on objective ingredient quality, formulation standards, and label transparency, with no weighting for taste, marketing, or popularity – is one that most consumers in the United States will not have encountered. HELL Energy, founded in Hungary in 2006, is not a household name in North America. It is, however, one of the largest energy drink manufacturers in the world by production volume, operating a megafactory with a combined annual capacity of ten billion cans, certified to the highest international food safety standards.

The brand is available in 60+ countries and holds category leadership in Hungary, its home market, where it commands a market share consistently around 65 per cent. In other markets where HELL leads, the brand typically holds 49–68 per cent market share. In India – one of the most logistically and competitively demanding consumer markets on earth – it achieved category leadership in under five years. So it is not a small or unproven player. It is simply one that has not prioritised the North American market, where the competitive barriers to entry and the margin pressures on formulation quality are both at their most extreme. Notably, despite its scale and quality credentials, HELL typically sits on the shelf at around half the price of the global category leader – a combination that, in the markets where it competes, has proven difficult to argue against.

Its position at the top of the SCI is consistent with a product philosophy that has prioritised ingredient quality over cost reduction. The brand uses no artificial preservatives, no aspartame, and real sugar in its standard formulations. These are not unusual choices in the European context. They are, however, choices that distinguish it sharply from the formulation norms of the world’s most valuable energy drink market.

The marketing history is worth noting, not because it is the basis for the ranking – it emphatically is not – but because it illustrates a pattern of deliberate strategic positioning over two decades. The brand entered Formula 1 sponsorship at a point when that association carried category credibility, then exited before the returns diminished. Bruce Willis fronted global campaigns for six consecutive years. The successor chosen – Michele Morrone, a strikingly handsome Italian actor and former model for a number of international fashion brands, whose career was at an early stage when the partnership began – has since appeared alongside Sidney Sweeney and is in upcoming productions with Sir Anthony Hopkins, Al Pacino, Jessica Alba, and Andy Garcia. The instinct for identifying cultural traction before it becomes expensive has been consistent.

It does, however, suggest that a brand capable of that quality of market timing over twenty years is unlikely to be sitting still on formulation either.

What this means for the category

The energy drink market is, in one sense, two markets that have been allowed to share a name for long enough that the distinction has become invisible. The publication of the SCI makes that distinction visible, and the question now is whether the market responds.

The organic food and beverage movement offers a partial precedent. Products positioned on ingredient quality and transparency were, for much of the 1990s and 2000s, treated as niche and overpriced. They eventually found their mainstream. The process was slow and required both consumer education and retail willingness to give quality-positioned products shelf space alongside cheaper alternatives. The energy drink category is earlier in that process, but the direction of travel – in regulatory terms, in consumer awareness terms, and now in independent assessment terms – is not difficult to read.

For distributors and retailers assessing which brands to build positions around over the next decade, the arrival of an objective global quality framework is, if anything, a simplifying development. The question of which energy drink to back has historically been answered primarily by marketing power and distribution reach. It can now also be answered, at least in part, by ingredient quality and formulation transparency.

About The Six Continents Index & Fine Liquids

The Six Continents Index (https://sixcontinentsindex.com) was conducted independently by Pat Eckert and his team at Fine Liquids, Meckesheim, Germany. Assessed brands were not notified in advance and had no involvement in the evaluation. No paid participation, sponsorship, or commercial influence played any role.

About Author

Cloud PR Wire

See author's posts

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Atlanta Bookshelves Introduces New Custom Home Library and Built-In Wall System Program for Modern Interiors

Published

4 hours ago

on

May 27, 2026

By

A new service initiative focused on fully customized home library environments and integrated built-in wall systems designed for contemporary residential spaces.

Atlanta, Georgia, 27th May 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Atlanta Bookshelves, a custom carpentry and architectural woodwork company specializing in bespoke shelving and cabinetry, today announced the launch of its new Custom Home Library and Built-In Wall System Program. The initiative expands the company’s service offerings across Metro Atlanta and provides homeowners with fully tailored solutions for residential storage, reading spaces, and integrated interior wall design. Atlanta Bookshelves is introducing the program in response to increased demand for structured, permanent storage systems that align with modern interior layouts and multifunctional living requirements.

Atlanta Bookshelves stated that the program is designed to address a growing need among homeowners seeking cohesive, built-in environments rather than standalone furniture solutions. The new offering includes full-scale design, fabrication, and installation of home library systems and architectural wall units that integrate directly into residential structures. According to Atlanta Bookshelves, the program reflects a shift in how homeowners are approaching interior planning, with greater emphasis on functionality, space optimization, and long-term durability.

Program Overview and Objectives

The Custom Home Library and Built-In Wall System Program is structured to provide end-to-end design and build services for residential clients. Atlanta Bookshelves will work directly with homeowners, builders, and designers to create tailored installations that match architectural dimensions, interior aesthetics, and functional needs.

Atlanta Bookshelves explained that the program is not based on standardized configurations. Instead, each project is developed from the ground up, ensuring that shelving depth, cabinet placement, and wall integration are specifically adapted to the space. This approach allows Atlanta Bookshelves to create installations that appear as natural extensions of the home rather than added fixtures.

The primary objective of the program is to enhance usability while maintaining visual cohesion. Atlanta Bookshelves emphasized that modern interiors require storage systems that support multiple functions, including reading, media display, workspace organization, and general household storage.

Design and Planning Process

Each project within the program begins with a detailed consultation and measurement phase. Atlanta Bookshelves evaluates room dimensions, lighting conditions, architectural features, and homeowner usage patterns before developing design concepts.

The company utilizes digital modeling tools to produce visual representations of proposed installations. These models allow clients to review layout options and make adjustments before fabrication begins. Atlanta Bookshelves stated that this process improves accuracy and ensures alignment between design intent and final execution.

Once a design is approved, Atlanta Bookshelves transitions into fabrication. Materials are selected based on durability, grain consistency, and compatibility with the overall design. The company explained that careful planning at the early stages reduces installation issues and supports a more seamless integration into the home environment.

Built-In Wall Systems for Modern Interiors

A key component of the new program is the development of full-height built-in wall systems. These installations are designed to maximize vertical space while maintaining structural balance within a room.

Atlanta Bookshelves noted that built-in wall systems are increasingly used in living rooms, home offices, and entertainment areas. These systems often combine shelving, cabinetry, and concealed storage into a single architectural feature. By integrating multiple functions into one design, Atlanta Bookshelves helps reduce visual clutter and improve spatial efficiency.

The company explained that modern residential design trends have shifted toward open layouts and multifunctional rooms. As a result, built-in systems must accommodate changing needs while maintaining a consistent visual structure. Atlanta Bookshelves designs each system to support both display and storage requirements without compromising interior flow.

Craftsmanship and Fabrication Standards

Atlanta Bookshelves continues to emphasize craftsmanship as a core component of its production process. Each library system and wall unit is constructed using precise joinery techniques and carefully selected materials intended to support long-term use.

The company integrates advanced fabrication tools, including CNC machinery, to ensure dimensional accuracy and repeatability across complex designs. However, Atlanta Bookshelves stated that machine precision is paired with hands-on woodworking practices during assembly and finishing stages.

This combination allows Atlanta Bookshelves to maintain consistent quality while accommodating custom design variations. The company explained that attention to detail during fabrication is essential for achieving seamless integration with existing architectural elements.

Demand in Metro Atlanta Residential Market

Atlanta Bookshelves reported that demand for custom home libraries and built-in systems has increased steadily across Metro Atlanta. Homeowners are investing in renovations that prioritize organization, long-term value, and efficient use of space.

The company noted that changing work patterns and increased time spent at home have contributed to a rise in requests for dedicated reading spaces and integrated home office solutions. Atlanta Bookshelves believes this trend reflects a broader shift toward intentional residential design.

Atlanta Bookshelves stated that the new program is structured to support this demand while offering scalable solutions for a wide range of property types, including single-family homes, townhouses, and new construction developments.

Collaboration With Homeowners and Designers

A central feature of the program is collaborative design development. Atlanta Bookshelves works closely with clients throughout each stage of the process to ensure alignment between vision and execution.

Design discussions focus on both aesthetic preferences and functional requirements. Atlanta Bookshelves considers factors such as storage capacity, accessibility, lighting integration, and architectural compatibility.

The company emphasized that collaboration reduces design inefficiencies and improves overall project outcomes. By involving clients early in the planning process, Atlanta Bookshelves ensures that each installation reflects the specific needs of the household.

 Longevity and Sustainability Considerations

Atlanta Bookshelves also highlighted the long-term advantages of custom built-in systems. Unlike modular furniture, built-ins are designed to remain in place for extended periods, reducing the need for replacement and minimizing material waste.

The company stated that durability is achieved through structural reinforcement, quality materials, and precision construction methods. Atlanta Bookshelves believes that long-lasting installations contribute to both environmental responsibility and financial efficiency.

By focusing on permanence and adaptability, the program supports sustainable design practices that align with modern homeowner expectations.

 Program Availability Across Metro Atlanta

The Custom Home Library and Built-In Wall System Program is now available to residential clients throughout Metro Atlanta. Atlanta Bookshelves will prioritize projects based on consultation scheduling and design scope, with services expanding to additional areas as capacity increases.

Atlanta Bookshelves stated that the rollout will continue throughout the year as part of its broader effort to expand custom woodwork services across the region. The company expects strong interest from homeowners seeking integrated storage and architectural design solutions.

About Atlanta Bookshelves

Atlanta Bookshelves is a custom carpentry and architectural woodwork company based in Atlanta, Georgia. The company specializes in bespoke shelving, cabinetry, home libraries, and integrated built-in wall systems for residential and commercial interiors. Atlanta Bookshelves combines traditional woodworking craftsmanship with modern fabrication technology to create custom installations designed for functionality, durability, and architectural cohesion.

About Author

Cloud PR Wire

See author's posts

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

ERC-7943 Enters Final Status as Ethereum’s Framework for Real-World Asset Tokenization

Published

6 hours ago

on

May 27, 2026

By

The Universal Real-World Asset (uRWA) standard is now specification-frozen and ready for production adoption across Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks

Barcelona, Spain, May 27th, 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, ERC-7943, the Universal Real-World Asset (uRWA) standard, has reached Final status within Ethereum’s formal standards process. The specification is now frozen – with its interface, error definitions, event signatures, and behavioral requirements fixed – and is available for production adoption across Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks.

ERC-7943 defines a minimal, vendor-neutral interface for the compliant tokenization of real-world assets. The standard addresses transfer validation, asset freezing, forced transfers, and enforcement actions without binding implementers to a specific identity provider, jurisdictional framework, or compliance stack. This approach enables institutions and developers to deploy regulated assets across jurisdictions while retaining flexibility over underlying compliance infrastructure.

“ERC-7943 gives institutions and developers a modular interface for compliance, transfer controls, and enforcement, so they can deploy regulated assets in any jurisdiction without depending on a single vendor’s stack,”

said Dario Lo Buglio, lead author of ERC-7943. “Compliance becomes pluggable since the standard separates the on-chain interface from the underlying KYC, sanctions, and jurisdiction logic.”

Final status represents the threshold for enterprise adoption in Ethereum’s standards process, as proposals may undergo substantial changes before reaching this stage. ERC-7943 attained Final status following multiple cycles of community review through Ethereum Magicians and the EIP working group. With the standard now finalized, institutions and infrastructure providers can build on a stable specification designed for long-term interoperability.

Early adoption is already underway. The Capital Markets and Technology Association (CMTA) has integrated ERC-7943 into recent releases of CMTAT, its open-source tokenization framework deployed in institutional initiatives globally. Chainlink has separately demonstrated compatibility through a public pull request tied to its Asset Compliance Engine (ACE). Brickken plans to integrate ERC-7943 into upcoming institutional infrastructure upgrades, with the standard expected to become the default framework across its product suite. These developments signal a transition from specification to active deployment across infrastructure and compliance environments.

The coalition supporting ERC-7943 has grown since its September 2025 announcement and now spans the full RWA stack, encompassing issuance platforms, infrastructure providers, exchanges, marketplaces, identity vendors, and audit firms. Backers and contributors include Bit2me, Brickken, Casper Network, CMTA, Compellio, Dekalabs, DigiShares, Forte Protocol, FullyTokenized, Propchain, RealEstate.Exchange, Stobox, and Zoth. Hacken and QuillAudits serve as security and audit partners.

The standard is open for adoption by issuers, infrastructure providers, and developers building tokenized financial instruments. Documentation, reference implementations, and community channels are available at erc7943.org. The full specification is published at eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7943.

About Bit2me

Bit2Me is the leading cryptoassets company in Spain, registered with the CNMV as a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP). The company has been building crypto infrastructure for more than 10 years and holds several cybersecurity and regulatory compliance certifications, including: ISO 27001 for Information Security Management; ISO 22301 for Business Continuity Management; ISO 37001 for Anti-Bribery and Corporate Ethics; ISO 37301 for Compliance Management Systems; UNE 19601 for Criminal Compliance Management Systems; and the CSA STAR Level 1 certification. https://bit2me.com/

About Brickken 

Brickken is a global leader in the tokenization of real-world assets, offering a comprehensive SaaS platform that enables businesses to tokenize equity, debt, and revenue-sharing models. By integrating traditional finance with blockchain technology, Brickken provides tools to simplify asset management, enhance investor engagement, and unlock liquidity. With over $500 million in tokenized assets and a presence in 30 countries, Brickken is at the forefront of innovation in asset tokenization. To learn more about Brickken, visit www.brickken.com/

About Compellio

Compellio SA is a deeptech company headquartered in Luxembourg providing global infrastructure components for bridging the gap between web2 and web3 computing. Based on its patented technology, Compellio works with public and private organisations in driving regulatory-compliant solutions across multiple industries. Compellio’s tokenisation platform enables developers to abstract away the complexity of smart contracts and build standardised interoperability frameworks for the lifecycle management of their physical, digital, and hybrid assets. For more information, visit https://compellio.com

About Dekalabs

Dekalabs is a Valencia-based software development and digital transformation consultancy specializing in cutting-edge blockchain solutions. With a multidisciplinary and senior technical team, they deliver bespoke services spanning mobile applications, web applications, corporate solutions, UI/UX, and artificial intelligence (dekalabs.com).

About DigiShares

DigiShares is a market-leading provider of white-label software for the compliant issuance, management, and trading of tokenized real-world assets. The platform enables asset owners and fund managers to fractionalize assets, onboard global investors at low cost, and provide peer-to-peer or exchange-based liquidity through integrations with regulated venues such as RealEstate.Exchange. With more than 200 clients worldwide, offices in the US and Denmark, a network of 80+ legal partners, and integrations across Ethereum, Polygon, and other EVM chains, DigiShares offers one of the most flexible and customizable solutions in the industry. See www.digishares.io. 

About Hacken

Hacken is an end-to-end blockchain security & compliance partner for digital assets. Unlike traditional providers, Hacken was born on blockchain. We combine deep Web3 expertise with enterprise-grade quality, AI-powered offensive security, and globally recognized certifications. Since 2017, Hacken has been trusted by 1,500 adopters including the European Commission, ADGM, MetaMask, Ethereum Foundation, and Binance to secure the new digital frontier. Visit www.hacken.io

About the Forte Protocol

The Forte Protocol is a next-generation blockchain infrastructure that unlocks tokenized economies, enabling developers to define, launch, and monetize their on-chain projects. Through its ecosystem of products and services, Forte Protocol is the infrastructure layer for safe, enduring digital economies that generate long-term value for developers and users. For more information, visit ForteFoundation.io

About FullyTokenized

FullyTokenized is a boutique development company specializing in custom blockchain, tokenization, and Web3 solutions. With a proven track record of delivering successful projects in highly regulated financial environments, including for Fortune Global 500 institutions, the company has contributed to projects representing more than $500M in tokenized value. FullyTokenized also empowers Web3 startups, helping them launch products in under 90 days and scale within the decentralized ecosystem. Visit https://www.fullytokenized.com to learn more.

About Propchain

Propchain is the technology vertical of Prop.com, building institutional-grade infrastructure for real estate financing and tokenized capital markets. Backed by Prop.com’s ~$150M in AUM and active operations across Europe and the UAE, Propchain connects real-world deal flow to digital rails for origination, compliant issuance, lifecycle servicing, investor reporting, and secondary distribution. The company is building one of the world’s first fully unified, standardized, verified data infrastructure layers for real estate—harmonizing operational, financial, and legal data into auditable records that enhance underwriting, monitoring, and transparency. Securitisations are issued out of Luxembourg, aligning with European regulatory frameworks and institutional best practice. Propchain’s product suite, including PropYield, is purpose-built to bridge high-quality real assets with modern market infrastructure, enabling scalable access to real estate yield while preserving rigorous compliance, governance, and data integrity.

About RealEstate.Exchange

RealEstate.Exchange (REX) is the world’s first licensed and regulated exchange purpose-built for tokenized real estate shares. REX combines decentralized finance technology with full compliance layers, enabling investors worldwide—both retail and institutional—to trade tokenized real estate shares directly from their self-custodial wallets. The platform offers instantaneous atomic-swap settlement, competitive listing fees, and a liquidity framework supported by the BRICK token. With its global legal network and partnerships with licensed entities, REX aims to become the go-to venue for secondary trading of tokenized real estate, see www.realestate.exchange. 

About Stobox

Stobox is a turnkey asset tokenization provider and technology company focused on building the infrastructure for compliant digital assets. It enables businesses and individuals to transform real-world assets into tokenized instruments that are transparent, liquid, and accessible. Core solutions include Stobox 4 for token issuance and management, the STV3 Protocol for compliant token frameworks, Stobox DID for digital identity, and the Stobox Oracle for real-world data integration. Its structured methodology supports issuers across every stage of the tokenization lifecycle, from legal readiness to fundraising and secondary markets. Companies benefit from streamlined access to capital and global investors, while investors gain exposure to previously illiquid opportunities. https://www.stobox.io/

About Zoth

Zoth is reimagining global finance with the world’s first full-stack, modular Stablecoin Operating System, enabling enterprises and institutions to launch stablecoins and tokenized RWAs 90% faster and 70% cheaper. Its core products include FAAST (compliant tokenization infrastructure), Stablecoin Studio (stablecoin-in-a-box), ZeUSD (yield-bearing stablecoin), and PayX7 (stablecoin payments infrastructure).

Zoth delivers a full-stack suite spanning tokenization, payments, and yield management, supported by BVI & CIMA-regulated fund structures across 127 countries. Recognized by Messari as a top player in PayFi and RWAFi, Zoth combines compliance, scalability, and innovation to power the future of real-world finance. Visit https://zoth.io/.

About Author

Cloud PR Wire

See author's posts

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

LATEST POST

Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe Us
Follow Us