Connect with us

Press Release

ACI quantitative robot-The power of reading the trends

Published

on

In 1962, Everett-Rogers proposed the theory of innovative diffusion, designed to explain how, why, and how quickly new ideas and technologies were spread. The theory explains how a product or technology gains momentum and spreads across a specific population over time. The end result is that people apply a product, technology, or idea. One of the key implications is that the application of a new technology in the population does not occur simultaneously. Instead, certain people and groups are more likely to apply technology at different times, consistent with specific psychological and social characteristics. There are five established applicationcategories for new ideas or products. These categories are defined below.

A The Innovator. “Innovators are adventurous and willing to take the risks. They fundamentally wanted to be the first person to try something new. Their goal is to explore new technologies or innovation and to find opportunities to be drivers of change. 」

B Early App. “Once the benefits of a new innovation start to become obvious, early apps are eager to try. Early apps bought new technology to achieve revolutionary breakthroughs that gave them a huge competitive advantage in their industry. They like to gain more advantages than their peers, and they seem to have the time and money to invest. 」

C Early majority. “The early majority of the mainstream usually focused on innovation in solving specific problems. They look for complete products that are fully tested, adhere to industry standards, and are used by others they know in the industry. They are looking for gradual, proven ways to do what they are already doing. 」

D Later majority. “The late most are risk aversion, applying only new innovations to avoid the embarrassment of being left behind. 」

E The Times. “The outdated people stick to the end. They valued traditional methods of doing things and refused to apply new technologies until they were eliminated by previous systems and forced to do it. 」

Bitcoin has captured the human imagination. Bitcoin’s story is perhaps more tempting than any previous high-tech innovation. It brings the most cutting-edge innovation to one of the foundations of mankind: currency. Given the possibility of revolutionizing such a fundamental concept, Bitcoin underwent several speculative cycles in its brief history. However, it would be a serious mistake to use these cycles as grounds for denying Bitcoin. These cycles are a well-understood psychological phenomenon caused by man’s fascination with new things. Moreover, any excessive emphasis on foam is to see the trees without the forest. Because, in just 12 years, Bitcoin has grown to 135 million users worldwide, with a faster application rate than the Internet, mobile phone, or virtual banking tools, namely PayPal, in the comparable period. At the current application rate, Bitcoin will reach 1 billion users in four years. Bitcoin, like all previous innovative technologies, is following a predictable and transparent application curve, although accelerating.

Such an incremental user base, the dividend period retained to us ordinary people about how long still?

Which track should we choose during the dividend period, and what can we can and do on this track?

These will be left for everyone to sink down to think;

For me personally, why I choose quantitative trading this derivative as a long-term development track, why I choose ACI quantitative robot, below I explain this question from two aspects.

First, the above mentioned Bitcoin development rate and user growth base, then for this market must be more and more user growth base, because this is the market of mankind, is Bitcoin’s original design concept —— decentralization, in the future, more and more people will enter the huge market derived from the digital currency such as bitcoin, Ethereum; the longer time period, one year, two years or five years, this cycle youcan grasp the number of your wealth appreciation (the biggest wealth);

Second, the first thing new users enter the market must face the secondary market, retained in the secondary market will learn currency speculation and trading, so what is the biggest difference between quantitative and labor? To enter the secondary market to do trading, the first is to learn mathematics, physics and chemistry, the second is anti-humanity, to face and accept the market of every market fluctuations, the third is to establish a set of their own trading system and resolutely implement. These three points seem simple, but need the hard conditions: 1, talent; 2, systematic learning and combat; 3,5 or even over 10 years of full-time experience; otherwise why there has been a saying: one profit, two draws, two losses and seven losses. Ask, if every user can make money in the digital money market, where does the money come from? And quantitative trading it is more suitable for ordinary players, it also has a scientific name called algorithm trading, it will replace artificial strategy, with mathematical models and scientific strategy, to achieve a certain conditions, but its profit is a stable long-term absolute value, rather than the short term of wealth; because each of us enter the digital currency secondary market, the original intention is to improve life, achieve wealth growth, increase the happiness index;

Third, why do you choose the ACI quantitative robot as a tool to fry the currency?

1. Select any product to make a comparison, especially the financial industry; here put forward a core: withdrawal rate is linked to risk, and the secondary market price of digital currency fluctuates greatly, a careless will be a large withdrawal, so we choose the product is not its return rate, but two products, product recovery rate is 100%, and 50%, product 20 year rate is 70%, and the withdrawal rate is 10%, the choice is only product 2;

2. Fund utilization rate, not just play finance, as long as you do business you will understand that the nature of business is not related to fund utilization, the greater your capital utilization proves that the more you can do, the more pipeline to profit; (those who play Martin strategy)

3. The concept reflected by the ACI quantitative robot is also consistent with the personal development ideal, It is free and continuously updated and optimized for life, Of course there is no free lunch, After all, everything takes costs, It charges a small transaction fee, To mark 99.99% of the various products on the current market, All exceptions are the lowest 20% profit withdrawals, Take an example here, If 10,000 u profit 1,000 u, Excluding withdrawal servants and exchange fees, Only over 700 u, came up with While the same ACI quantized robot profits 1,000 u, with 10,000 u Remove fees, Final hand 935-940u;

4. API technology interface of trading platform, do quantitative is a core is security and stability, as the three head compliance trading platform —— currency network, I think I don’t need me to introduce, whether from the user base, trading depth or technical security, is the best choice, after all, security and stability is not what we want;

Simply summary, quantification is actually statistics

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Frank Okunak Calls Out “Plausible Deniability” as a Hidden Risk in Modern Corporate Leadership

Published

on

  • Why Rationalizing Short-Term Decisions Undermines Trust, Governance, and Long-Term Value

New Jersey, US, 12th January 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, In a new leadership commentary, executive strategist Frank Okunak is challenging a widely accepted but rarely discussed practice inside many organizations: the use of plausible deniability to rationalize decisions that leaders know are ethically questionable, financially misleading, or strategically shortsighted.

According to Okunak, plausible deniability often emerges not through overt misconduct, but through quiet justification. “It shows up when executives tell themselves, ‘We’ll fix it next quarter,’ or ‘This lifts the bonus plan now and we’ll true it up later,’” he explains. “The problem is that intent matters just as much as mechanics.”

Drawing on decades of experience across finance, operations, and corporate governance, Okunak describes a pattern in which leaders knowingly take actions that distort performance in the short term while relying on future adjustments to offset the impact. Common examples include manipulating accruals to meet quarterly targets, signing representation letters while aware of aggressive accounting treatments, or parking intercompany balances on the balance sheet until results improve.

“These decisions are often technically defensible in isolation,” Okunak notes. “But when taken together, they represent a breakdown in accountability. Leaders may not say the words out loud, but they understand exactly what they are doing.”

Okunak also points to extraordinary events such as the COVID-19 pandemic as moments when plausible deniability becomes especially tempting. “Crisis creates cover,” he says. “It allows organizations to bundle legitimate write-offs with unrelated management mistakes, inefficiencies, or bad decisions, all under the umbrella of an external event. Over time, that erodes transparency and trust.”

At the center of Okunak’s critique is the gap between formal compliance and ethical responsibility. He argues that many executives hide behind process, delegation, or technical standards to avoid confronting the intent behind their decisions. “Signing a representation letter while knowing the numbers were engineered to hit a target is not a process failure,” he says. “It’s a leadership failure.”

Okunak emphasizes that plausible deniability is dangerous precisely because it feels reasonable at the moment. Bonuses, incentive plans, market expectations, and investor pressure all contribute to a culture where short-term outcomes are rewarded and long-term consequences are deferred.

“Organizations don’t lose credibility overnight,” Okunak explains. “They lose it one rationalized decision at a time.”

The commentary calls for a renewed focus on moral clarity in executive decision-making particularly in finance, accounting, and performance management. Okunak urges boards, audit committees, and senior leaders to look beyond technical compliance and ask harder questions about intent, timing, and transparency.

“Good governance isn’t just about whether something can be justified,” he says. “It’s about whether it should be done at all.”

Okunak believes that addressing plausible deniability head-on is essential for restoring trust in corporate leadership. Organizations that fail to confront these gray zones, he warns, risk not only reputational damage but long-term strategic fragility.

“Leadership is tested not when the numbers are easy,” Okunak concludes, “but when pressure tempts you to explain away what you already know is wrong.” I have made mistakes and bad decisions along the way but I find it funny or let’s just say hypocritical that so many Executives point fingers and call out others when three fingers are pointing back at them.

About Frank Okunak

Frank Okunak is an executive strategist with decades of experience in finance, operations, and organizational leadership. He advises companies and senior leaders on governance, accountability, and long-term value creation, with a focus on aligning strategy, ethics, and performance.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

The Church of Scientology Welcomes 2026 With A Winter Community Festival

Published

on

    • The Church of Scientology of Los Angeles held a Winter Community Event for East Hollywood families to welcome the New Year.

    Los Angeles, California, 12th January 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, Rain forecast for the first week of the year was no stop for the Church of Scientology Los Angeles, who welcomed the New Year with a Winter Festival for the community held on January 1, featuring family-friendly activities and fun for children of all ages.

    All activities were held indoors, allowing families to stay warm and cozy. There was no shortage of fun, with a sing-along concert, a bubble show, arts and crafts, face painting, and more.

    Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard wrote in his book The Way to Happiness: “Today’s children will become tomorrow’s civilization.”

    Guided by this principle, the Church of Scientology Los Angeles creates family-friendly events throughout the year where the community can come together and children can enjoy a wide variety of activities in a safe space.

    This festival marks the beginning of a new year, and families and members of the community are invited to attend future community events held throughout the year on L. Ron Hubbard Way.

    In addition to special events, anyone curious to learn more about Scientology and the Church’s community assistance programs is welcome to visit at any time.

    The Church of Scientology of Los Angeles was dedicated by Scientology ecclesiastical leader Mr. David Miscavige in 2010. It is designed to provide the ideal facilities for Scientologists on their ascent to higher states of spiritual freedom and to serve as a home for the entire community and a meeting ground of cooperative effort to uplift people of all denominations.

    To learn more, visit the website of the Church of Scientology Los Angeles or watch Inside a Church of Scientology on the Scientology Network on DIRECTV channel 320, at Scientology.tv, through mobile apps, or via the Roku, Amazon Fire and Apple TV platforms.

    © 2026 CSWUS. All Rights Reserved. Grateful acknowledgement is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for permission to reproduce a selection from the copyrighted works of L. Ron Hubbard. SCIENTOLOGY is a trademark and service mark owned by Religious Technology Center and is used with its permission. SCIENTOLOGIST is a collective membership mark designating members of the affiliated Scientology churches and missions. Created in USA.

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

Press Release

Ryan Weible of San Ramon Helps First-Time Buyers Navigate the Bay Area’s Competitive Real Estate Market

Published

on

San Ramon, CA, 12th January 2026, ZEX PR WIRE, For many first-time buyers, purchasing a home in the Bay Area can feel out of reach. Tight inventory, fast-moving deals, and rising costs make the process overwhelming. Ryan Weible of San Ramon, a Partner at the Leah Tounger Realty Group, is helping clients break through those barriers with a clear, step-by-step approach grounded in preparation, communication, and local insight.

A Bay Area native with a background in education and the arts, Weible combines people-first values with real estate knowledge to serve buyers who need structure and support during high-stakes decisions. In just his first year in the industry, he closed 12 transactions and built a reputation for helping new buyers stay focused and informed throughout the homebuying process.

“Many of my clients are first-time buyers who don’t come from families with real estate experience,” said Weible. “They’re smart and capable, but no one’s shown them how this works. That’s where I come in.”

Weible joined the Leah Tounger Realty Group in 2024, working under the KW Advisors East Bay brokerage. The team is one of the top-producing groups in the region, with more than $76 million in closed volume in the past year. The team focuses on Oakland, Berkeley, San Ramon, and surrounding East Bay cities.

Weible’s approach begins with listening. From the first consultation, he works to understand his clients’ goals, timelines, financial readiness, and decision-making styles. He builds a plan that breaks the homebuying process into manageable steps—often including lender introductions, neighborhood research, and customized timelines for education and touring.

“People don’t need hype. They need clarity,” Weible said. “I give them a structure so they know what’s coming next and where their energy should go.”

As a San Ramon resident, Weible brings local knowledge to each transaction. He helps buyers weigh tradeoffs between neighborhoods, compare schools, navigate traffic patterns, and assess long-term investment potential. His guidance helps clients stay grounded in both their budget and their values.

Before entering real estate, Weible spent over 20 years in education, leadership, and the performing arts. He served as Assistant Head of School at Bentley School, directed theatre programs across the region, and taught courses in communication and community engagement. He also led safety programs, staff development, and inclusion work in K-12 settings—experience that now translates into careful preparation and patient pacing for his real estate clients.

His past roles taught him to manage pressure, guide group decision-making, and help people stay calm through unfamiliar situations. That training is now a strength when helping buyers handle bidding wars, inspections, or escrow deadlines.

“My job is to hold the space and make the next step clear. That’s what I did in schools, that’s what I do now.”

Weible also operates Hit The Mark Realty and contributes to community resources through Emeryville. Real Estate, a site that offers local listings and real estate education. He partners with KW Advisors East Bay for brokerage services and is licensed throughout California.

He brings a calm, affirming presence to each deal. Many of his clients are navigating more than market pressure—they may be buying solo, relying on gifts or grants, or trying to move from rent to ownership without generational wealth behind them. Weible focuses on access and inclusion by creating an experience where all questions are welcome and no one is left guessing.

“I’ve worked with teachers, nonprofit staff, artists, and healthcare workers—people who give so much but often feel shut out of ownership. We work together to get them there.”

In a competitive market like San Ramon, he emphasizes preparation over perfection. His clients often win homes by being ready early, submitting clean offers, and moving fast—but never recklessly.

“I don’t push urgency. I teach readiness.”

Looking ahead, Weible plans to expand first-time buyer services with group workshops, free planning calls, and a written guide tailored to East Bay buyers. He is also developing partnerships with local lenders and credit unions to streamline access to financing options.

Whether buyers are weeks or months from making an offer, Weible encourages them to start with a conversation.

“You don’t have to know everything. You just need someone who will walk the path with you.”

To learn more or schedule a consultation, visit ryanweiblerealtor.com

About Author

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Digi Observer journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.

Continue Reading

LATEST POST